Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 244154

Summary: SMBus does not work on ATI/AMD SB700 chipset
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: henry su <henry.su>
Component: kernelAssignee: Bhavna Sarathy <bnagendr>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Jenner <mjenner>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.0CC: alan, bnagendr, jbaron, jgarzik, poelstra, prarit, shane.huang
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: OtherQA
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 19:53:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 221316, 252286    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch: add the SMBus device ID none

Description henry su 2007-06-14 07:45:43 UTC
Description of problem:all functions of SMBus does not work correctly


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.6.18

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.start OS normally.
2.get cpu temperature,voltages etc from SB700 SMBus.


  
Actual results:
return value is zero

Expected results:
return the value of temperature or voltages

Additional info:

Comment 1 henry su 2007-06-14 07:49:23 UTC
Created attachment 156963 [details]
patch: add the SMBus device ID

Comment 2 Bhavna Sarathy 2007-06-15 16:31:03 UTC
patch posted to RHML on Jun 15

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2007-06-15 17:48:08 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Kernel Team for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release, and has moved to bugzilla 
status POST.

Comment 5 Don Zickus 2007-07-19 21:24:30 UTC
in kernel-2.6.18-32.el5

Comment 7 John Poelstra 2007-08-14 19:44:25 UTC
A fix for this issue has been included in the packages contained in the beta
(RHN channel) or most recent snapshot (partners.redhat.com) for RHEL5.1.  Please
verify that your issue is fixed.

After you (Red Hat Partner) have verified that this issue has been addressed,
please perform the following:
1) Change the *status* of this bug to VERIFIED.
2) Add *keyword* of PartnerVerified (leaving the existing keywords unmodified)

If this issue is not fixed, please add a comment describing the most recent
symptoms of the problem you are having and change the status of the bug to ASSIGNED.

Comment 8 John Poelstra 2007-08-24 05:24:26 UTC
A fix for this issue should have been included in the packages contained in the
most recent snapshot (partners.redhat.com) for RHEL5.1.  

Requested action: Please verify that your issue is fixed as soon as possible to
ensure that it is included in this update release.

After you (Red Hat Partner) have verified that this issue has been addressed,
please perform the following:
1) Change the *status* of this bug to VERIFIED.
2) Add *keyword* of PartnerVerified (leaving the existing keywords unmodified)

If this issue is not fixed, please add a comment describing the most recent
symptoms of the problem you are having and change the status of the bug to FAILS_QA.

More assistance: If you cannot access bugzilla, please reply with a message to
Issue Tracker and I will change the status for you.  If you need assistance
accessing ftp://partners.redhat.com, please contact your Partner Manager.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 19:53:14 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html