Bug 244166 - Berkeley DB's license specified incorrectly in RPM License field
Summary: Berkeley DB's license specified incorrectly in RPM License field
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: db4   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact:
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-06-14 09:38 UTC by Mark Schreiber
Modified: 2013-07-02 23:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-06-18 10:39:15 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mark Schreiber 2007-06-14 09:38:37 UTC
Description of problem:
The db4- RPM's license is specified as being "BSD-style". 
"BSD-style" licenses allow incorporation of a package into other proprietary
packages.  This does not reflect Berkeley DB's license.  Versions of Berkeley DB
prior to v2.0 are, according to Wikipedia, under a license that looks something
like the BSD license with some GPL additions.  Versions at and above 2.0 are
available under a commercial license (currently available from Oracle) or under
the Sleepycat Public License (
http://opensource.feratech.com/licenses/sleepycat.php ), which is rather like a
strict GPL -- any software package that so much as uses this package must also
provide source code.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:rpm -qi db4 and look at the License field

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpm -qi db4
Actual results:BSD-style

Expected results:"Sleepycat License"

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2007-06-18 10:39:15 UTC
The BSD-style license was suggested by Red Hat legal department and therefore I
won't change it since I'm not a lawier.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.