Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib.spec SRPM URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-0.1.6-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: Common code used to support the vergen libraries. Fedora Account System Username: jsteffan
Is it possible to use the latest version, which is 9.1.0? https://crates.io/crates/vergen-lib/versions
Changelog: - Update to latest Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib.spec SRPM URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm
If you’re going to disable the tests, you should justify it, something like (in rust2rpm.toml): [tests] run = false comments = [ "Tests expect to be run in the workspace; they require a test_util crate", ] However, it turns out that you can patch out the import of the test_util workspace crate, which is currently entirely unused for vergen-lib in particular, and run all the included tests after all, something like this: diff -Naur vergen-lib-9.1.0-original/src/lib.rs vergen-lib-9.1.0/src/lib.rs --- vergen-lib-9.1.0-original/src/lib.rs 2006-07-24 02:21:28.000000000 +0100 +++ vergen-lib-9.1.0/src/lib.rs 2026-03-29 08:25:03.328066431 +0100 @@ -241,7 +241,9 @@ #![cfg_attr(coverage_nightly, feature(coverage_attribute))] #[cfg(test)] -use {temp_env as _, test_util as _}; +// Downstream patch: the test_util workspace crate dep. is currently unused +// use {temp_env as _, test_util as _}; +use {temp_env as _}; pub mod constants; mod emitter; That would be even better. For an example of tracking a patch in rust2rpm.toml, see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-icu_provider/blob/4e61c9aed99c6e357720128819be78926b664d91/f/rust2rpm.toml#_6.
Changelog: - Add rust2rpm toml, incorporate any feedback Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib.spec SRPM URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm rust2rpm.toml URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-rust2rpm.toml
There seems to be some problem with the following file. SRPM URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
(In reply to Fedora Review Service from comment #5) > There seems to be some problem with the following file. > SRPM URL: > https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm > Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. > Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. If you can fix this, I’ll try to take another look.
Sorry about that. Two issues, infrastructure issues with fedora people, and I uploaded the chroot src.rpms vs the host rpms so the dist tag changed on me. :) Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jsteffan/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jsteffan/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm rust2rpm.toml URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jsteffan/xrizer/rust-vergen-lib-rust2rpm.toml
Package APPROVED. Consider hiding the “unstable” feature. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer (should happen automatically) - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - track package in koschei for all built branches (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer) Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated The spec file is generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. The only manual change is the addition of vergen-lib-9.1.0-remove-test-util.patch, which is well-documented and reasonable to do downstream-only. Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/cargo/registry/vergen- lib-9.1.0/LICENSE-APACHE See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files OK: not a serious problem; due to reasonable rust2rpm design decisions. - Consider hiding the “unstable” feature, [features] hide = ["unstable"] until and unless something actually requires it. It would be better if nothing in Fedora depends on APIs that may not respect SemVer. This doesn’t block approval. (See the cautions in the rust2rpm.toml man page about features.hide.) ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "MIT License", "Apache License (v2.0) or MIT license". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/ben/fedora/review/2447810-rust-vergen-lib/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust- vergen-lib-devel , rust-vergen-lib+default-devel , rust-vergen- lib+build-devel , rust-vergen-lib+cargo-devel , rust-vergen- lib+emit_and_set-devel , rust-vergen-lib+git-devel , rust-vergen- lib+rustc-devel , rust-vergen-lib+si-devel , rust-vergen-lib+unstable- devel [x]: Package functions as described. (Tests pass) [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=145249678 (s390x tested by emulated local mockbuild due to current builder outage) [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rust-vergen-lib-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+default-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+build-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+cargo-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+emit_and_set-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+git-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+rustc-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+si-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib+unstable-devel-9.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpsbjrv5ns')] checks: 32, packages: 10 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 55 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 9 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 51 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/vergen-lib/9.1.0/download#/vergen-lib-9.1.0.crate : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b34a29ba7e9c59e62f229ae1932fb1b8fb8a6fdcc99215a641913f5f5a59a569 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b34a29ba7e9c59e62f229ae1932fb1b8fb8a6fdcc99215a641913f5f5a59a569 Requires -------- rust-vergen-lib-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(anyhow/default) >= 1.0.100 with crate(anyhow/default) < 2.0.0~) (crate(derive_builder/default) >= 0.20.2 with crate(derive_builder/default) < 0.21.0~) (crate(rustversion/default) >= 1.0.22 with crate(rustversion/default) < 2.0.0~) cargo rust rust-vergen-lib+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+build-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+cargo-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+emit_and_set-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+git-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+rustc-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+si-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib+unstable-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(vergen-lib) Provides -------- rust-vergen-lib-devel: crate(vergen-lib) rust-vergen-lib-devel rust-vergen-lib+default-devel: crate(vergen-lib/default) rust-vergen-lib+default-devel rust-vergen-lib+build-devel: crate(vergen-lib/build) rust-vergen-lib+build-devel rust-vergen-lib+cargo-devel: crate(vergen-lib/cargo) rust-vergen-lib+cargo-devel rust-vergen-lib+emit_and_set-devel: crate(vergen-lib/emit_and_set) rust-vergen-lib+emit_and_set-devel rust-vergen-lib+git-devel: crate(vergen-lib/git) rust-vergen-lib+git-devel rust-vergen-lib+rustc-devel: crate(vergen-lib/rustc) rust-vergen-lib+rustc-devel rust-vergen-lib+si-devel: crate(vergen-lib/si) rust-vergen-lib+si-devel rust-vergen-lib+unstable-devel: crate(vergen-lib/unstable) rust-vergen-lib+unstable-devel Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2447810 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: PHP, R, Perl, Java, fonts, Ocaml, SugarActivity, C/C++, Haskell, Python Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-vergen-lib Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`
FEDORA-2026-419e0dde06 (rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-419e0dde06
FEDORA-2026-419e0dde06 (rust-vergen-lib-9.1.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.