Bug 2450768 (CVE-2026-4775) - CVE-2026-4775 libtiff: libtiff: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service via signed integer overflow in TIFF file processing
Summary: CVE-2026-4775 libtiff: libtiff: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-4775
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2450769 2450770 2450771 2450772 2450773
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-03-24 14:34 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-05-07 20:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:12429 0 None None None 2026-04-30 17:31:07 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:12265 0 None None None 2026-04-30 12:19:45 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:12271 0 None None None 2026-04-30 14:13:09 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:14929 0 None None None 2026-05-07 20:58:37 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-03-24 14:34:15 UTC
A flaw was found in the libtiff library. A signed integer overflow exists in the putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function (and potentially similar functions like putcontig8bitYCbCr42tile, putcontig8bitYCbCr22tile, and putcontig8bitYCbCr12tile) within tif_getimage.c. When processing a specially crafted TIFF file with an extremely large width and specific YCbCr subsampling, the calculation for the pointer progression variable (incr) can overflow the 32-bit signed integer boundary. This results in an incorrect negative progression of memory pointers, leading to an out-of-bounds heap write. An attacker could exploit this to cause a denial of service (application crash) or potentially execute arbitrary code.

Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2026-04-30 12:19:45 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:12265 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12265

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2026-04-30 14:13:07 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:12271 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12271

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2026-05-07 20:58:36 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:14929 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14929


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.