Spec URL: https://straylen.web.cern.ch/rpms/python-sphinx-feature-classification/python-sphinx-feature-classification.spec SRPM URL: https://straylen.web.cern.ch/rpms/python-sphinx-feature-classification/python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm Description: Generate a matrix of pluggable drivers and their support to an API in Sphinx Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10273445 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2452955-python-sphinx-feature-classification/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10273445-python-sphinx-feature-classification/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Dist tag is present. - License field mismatch: The licensecheck tool reports multiple licenses, including "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License", and "Apache License 2.0". The spec file's `License:` tag is "Apache-2.0". This discrepancy needs to be resolved. Either the `License:` tag needs to be updated to accurately reflect all licenses present, or the unknown/generated licenses need to be clarified. (See Licensing Guidelines) - Directory ownership: The package creates directories `/usr/lib/python3.14` and `/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages` without explicitly owning them. The package must own all directories it creates. This can be fixed by adding these directories to the `%files` section. (See Filesystem Layout and Packaging Guidelines) ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License", "Apache License 2.0". 36 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/rpm-reviewer- djn6myzn/2452955-python-sphinx-feature-classification/licensecheck.txt [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.14, /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 3531 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_zcjkdwe')] checks: 32, packages: 2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 12 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_feature_classification/sphinx_feature_classification-2.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7cf4316ac8283b9761ed956990538c3bfd98974878792e6ac1492de8828ca247 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7cf4316ac8283b9761ed956990538c3bfd98974878792e6ac1492de8828ca247 Requires -------- python3-sphinx-feature-classification (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.14dist(docutils) python3.14dist(pbr) Provides -------- python3-sphinx-feature-classification: python-sphinx-feature-classification python3-sphinx-feature-classification python3.14-sphinx-feature-classification python3.14dist(sphinx-feature-classification) python3dist(sphinx-feature-classification)
Thank you for the review: Spec URL: https://straylen.web.cern.ch/rpms/python-sphinx-feature-classification/python-sphinx-feature-classification.spec SRPM URL: https://straylen.web.cern.ch/rpms/python-sphinx-feature-classification/python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm Main change is I have now enabled the documentation build as I have patched cliff in rawhide for python3.15a. Addressing your comments: - Dist tag is present. The release is Release: %{autorelease} The is normal when rpmautospec is in use with a spec using %autorelease, it is extended by the dist tag as per the .src.rpm name above. Maybe you mean something else ? - Directory ownership: The package creates directories `/usr/lib/python3.14` and `/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages` without explicitly owning them. The package must own all directories it creates. This can be fixed by adding these directories to the `%files` section. (See Filesystem Layout and Packaging Guidelines) The package requires: rpm -qp --requires ./results/python3-osc-placement-4.8.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm python(abi) = 3.14 and this bring in the python3-libs package which owns those directories. Significantly they will never be unowned. d - License field mismatch: This package is pretty well licensed I would say. * LICENSE file is good * pyproject.toml file is explicit Most of the "real" source files have headers on as well. The remaining files are things like .reno.conf (used for tests) , pyproject.yaml belong in the not relevant category, these are build scripts. There are certainly no files that contradict this is Apache-II all over.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10284838 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2452955-python-sphinx-feature-classification/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10284838-python-sphinx-feature-classification/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
I wanted to confirm the directory ownership since * This is a really normal python module * I think that's a false positive in the checker that should be fixed. On a rawhide node. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages error: file /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages: No such file or directory dnf install $(rpm -qpR ./python3-osc-placement-4.8.0-1.fc44.noarch.rpm | cut -f1 -d' ' |grep -v rpmlib) rpm -qf /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages python3-libs-3.14.3-2.fc45.x86_64 So that is good - this is a false positive in my opinion.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Dist tag is present. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License", "Apache License 2.0". 36 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-sphinx-feature- classification/2452955-python-sphinx-feature- classification/licensecheck.txt [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.14/site- packages, /usr/lib/python3.14 [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 3531 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp2jv26s4w')] checks: 32, packages: 2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 12 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.6 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Generate', 'Summary(en_US) Generate ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('matrix', 'Summary(en_US) matrix ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('of', 'Summary(en_US) of ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('drivers', 'Summary(en_US) drivers ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('and', 'Summary(en_US) and -> 2nd') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('their', 'Summary(en_US) their ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('support', 'Summary(en_US) support ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('to', 'Summary(en_US) to ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('an', 'Summary(en_US) an ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('This', '%description -l en_US This ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('is', '%description -l en_US is -> i.e.') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('directive', '%description -l en_US directive ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('that', '%description -l en_US that ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('allows', '%description -l en_US allows ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('creating', '%description -l en_US creating ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('matrices', '%description -l en_US matrices ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('of', '%description -l en_US of ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('drivers', '%description -l en_US drivers ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('project', '%description -l en_US project ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('contains', '%description -l en_US contains ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('and', '%description -l en_US and -> 2nd') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('which', '%description -l en_US which ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('features', '%description -l en_US features ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('they', '%description -l en_US they ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('support', '%description -l en_US support ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('The', '%description -l en_US The -> 7th') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('takes', '%description -l en_US takes ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('an', '%description -l en_US an ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('file', '%description -l en_US file ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('with', '%description -l en_US with ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('specific', '%description -l en_US specific ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('syntax', '%description -l en_US syntax ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('explained', '%description -l en_US explained ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('the', '%description -l en_US the -> 7th') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('usage', '%description -l en_US usage ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('documentation', '%description -l en_US documentation ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('to', '%description -l en_US to ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('generate', '%description -l en_US generate ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('projects', '%description -l en_US projects ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('have', '%description -l en_US have ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('authority', '%description -l en_US authority ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('say', '%description -l en_US say ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('what', '%description -l en_US what ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('supported', '%description -l en_US supported ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('within', '%description -l en_US within ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('their', '%description -l en_US their ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('own', '%description -l en_US own ') python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('repository', '%description -l en_US repository ') 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 48 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 48 badness; has taken 0.1 s Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_feature_classification/sphinx_feature_classification-2.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7cf4316ac8283b9761ed956990538c3bfd98974878792e6ac1492de8828ca247 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7cf4316ac8283b9761ed956990538c3bfd98974878792e6ac1492de8828ca247 Requires -------- python3-sphinx-feature-classification (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.14dist(docutils) python3.14dist(pbr) Provides -------- python3-sphinx-feature-classification: python-sphinx-feature-classification python3-sphinx-feature-classification python3.14-sphinx-feature-classification python3.14dist(sphinx-feature-classification) python3dist(sphinx-feature-classification) Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2452955 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python Disabled plugins: C/C++, fonts, R, SugarActivity, Perl, PHP, Haskell, Ocaml, Java Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=144505626 b) Not sure why getting spelling errors for contents of the common description. They do not occur at: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/python-sphinx-feature-classification/build/10339379/ c) License file does not need to be marked again as a license: $ rpm -qL python3-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx_feature_classification-2.1.0.dist-info/licenses/AUTHORS /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx_feature_classification-2.1.0.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/python3-sphinx-feature-classification/LICENSE please change %doc README.rst ChangeLog %license LICENSE to %doc README.rst ChangeLog d) It may be helpful to package the documentation. Example build with packaged documentation: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=144507572 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/python-sphinx-feature-classification/build/10339379/ e) Approved. Please fix (c) before import. Consider (d).
Thankyou for the review - what is going on with the spelling there? python3-sphinx-feature-classification.noarch: E: spelling-error ('say', '%description -l en_US say ') .....
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-feature-classification
There is something weird in that .spec file. ``` fedpkg mockbuild Could not execute mockbuild: Couldn’t parse spec file python-sphinx-feature-classification.spec: Spec file is missing. ``` Will look tomorrow.... Possibly cause of spelling madness.
FEDORA-2026-9d821c8e02 (python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-9d821c8e02
FEDORA-2026-9d821c8e02 (python-sphinx-feature-classification-2.1.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.