Bug 2453
| Summary: | XFree86 depends on xbanner ?!?!? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | monnier+lists/redhat/bugs |
| Component: | XFree86 | Assignee: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 1999-05-10 23:44:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
monnier+lists/redhat/bugs
1999-04-30 22:41:17 UTC
Because xbanner is used by xdm, I guess. maybe xdm should be put into a separate package? I think it would be good to split xdm config files and the like off from the main X package, so that people can still install the base X stuff on a small system without having to pull in all the stuff that's just there to make it look pretty and isn't necessary for functionality. Better would be a general revision in packaging to split 'pretty config files' away from everything else. For things like XDM, I'd suggest that there be a 'basic' set of config files in the core package, and another set of optional pretty config files. If the pretty config files are installed the basic ones can notice and include them; only the pretty config files would require things like xbanner et al. This may well be too complicated for RedHat to find worthwhile. Thank you for your suggestion. It will be considered for the next release of Red Hat Linux. |