Bug 2453354 - Review Request: rust-validator_derive - Macros 1.1 implementation of #[derive(Validate)]
Summary: Review Request: rust-validator_derive - Macros 1.1 implementation of #[derive...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Cristian Le
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/validator_de...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2453355
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-03-31 14:23 UTC by Ben Beasley
Modified: 2026-04-15 12:17 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-04-15 12:17:57 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
fedora: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Configuration file for rust2rpm (433 bytes, text/plain)
2026-03-31 14:23 UTC, Ben Beasley
no flags Details

Description Ben Beasley 2026-03-31 14:23:22 UTC
Created attachment 2135548 [details]
Configuration file for rust2rpm

Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-validator_derive.spec
SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-validator_derive-0.20.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: Macros 1.1 implementation of #[derive(Validate)].
Fedora Account System Username: music

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-01 03:52:58 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10280934
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2453354-rust-validator_derive/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10280934-rust-validator_derive/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-01 03:53:17 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10280933
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2453354-rust-validator_derive/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10280933-rust-validator_derive/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Cristian Le 2026-04-15 11:40:08 UTC
All LGTM

---

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- (because of dependent review)
  Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- (rust2rpm issue)
  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice:
  /usr/share/cargo/registry/validator-0.20.0/LICENSE
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License". 23 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453354-rust-validator_derive/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
     validator_derive-devel , rust-validator_derive+default-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 6.7 starting (python version = 3.14.3, NVR = mock-6.7-1.fc43), args: /usr/libexec/mock/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --no-cleanup-after --no-clean --plugin-option=tmpfs:keep_mounted=True --resultdir=/home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results install /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+unic-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+validator_derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+indexmap-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+default-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /home/cle/FedoraRPMs/2453355-rust-validator/results/rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
Start(bootstrap): init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish(bootstrap): init plugins
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Mock Version: 6.7
INFO: Mock Version: 6.7
Start(bootstrap): chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (fallback)
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (direct choice)
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/rust-validator-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+unic-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+validator_derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+indexmap-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+default-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M d5e8a2e55ea540d893dcfd95b678d013 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.nm27e3ex:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 45 install /builddir/rust-validator-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+unic-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+validator_derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+indexmap-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+default-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rust-validator-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+default-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+indexmap-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+unic-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator+validator_derive-devel-0.20.0-1.fc45.noarch.rpm
          rust-validator-0.20.0-1.fc45.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpuiah2o9a')]
checks: 32, packages: 9

rust-validator+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+derive-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+indexmap-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+unic-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator+validator_derive-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator.src: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
rust-validator-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('url', '%description -l en_US url -> URL, curl, purl')
 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 0 warnings, 49 filtered, 9 badness; has taken 0.7 s 




Source checksums
----------------
https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/validator/0.20.0/download#/validator-0.20.0.crate :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 43fb22e1a008ece370ce08a3e9e4447a910e92621bb49b85d6e48a45397e7cfa
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 43fb22e1a008ece370ce08a3e9e4447a910e92621bb49b85d6e48a45397e7cfa
https://github.com/Keats/validator/raw/refs/tags/v0.20.0/LICENSE :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 3f91b318232b91ccedaadc2b3fba4c3f3d2cc5300a685a97f24b167d11df2fe1
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3f91b318232b91ccedaadc2b3fba4c3f3d2cc5300a685a97f24b167d11df2fe1


Requires
--------
rust-validator-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(idna/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(idna/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(once_cell/default) >= 1.18.0 with crate(once_cell/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(regex) >= 1.0.0 with crate(regex) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(regex/std) >= 1.0.0 with crate(regex/std) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(serde_derive/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde_derive/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(serde_json/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde_json/default) < 2.0.0~)
    (crate(url/default) >= 2.0.0 with crate(url/default) < 3.0.0~)
    cargo
    rust

rust-validator+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(validator)

rust-validator+derive-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(validator)
    crate(validator/validator_derive)

rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(validator_derive/default) >= 0.20.0 with crate(validator_derive/default) < 0.21.0~)
    (crate(validator_derive/nightly_features) >= 0.20.0 with crate(validator_derive/nightly_features) < 0.21.0~)
    cargo
    crate(validator)
    crate(validator/derive)

rust-validator+indexmap-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(indexmap/default) >= 2.0.0 with crate(indexmap/default) < 3.0.0~)
    (crate(indexmap/serde) >= 2.0.0 with crate(indexmap/serde) < 3.0.0~)
    cargo
    crate(validator)

rust-validator+unic-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cargo
    crate(validator)
    crate(validator/unic-ucd-common)

rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(unic-ucd-common/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(unic-ucd-common/default) < 0.10.0~)
    cargo
    crate(validator)

rust-validator+validator_derive-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    (crate(validator_derive/default) >= 0.20.0 with crate(validator_derive/default) < 0.21.0~)
    cargo
    crate(validator)



Provides
--------
rust-validator-devel:
    crate(validator)
    rust-validator-devel

rust-validator+default-devel:
    crate(validator/default)
    rust-validator+default-devel

rust-validator+derive-devel:
    crate(validator/derive)
    rust-validator+derive-devel

rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel:
    crate(validator/derive_nightly_features)
    rust-validator+derive_nightly_features-devel

rust-validator+indexmap-devel:
    crate(validator/indexmap)
    rust-validator+indexmap-devel

rust-validator+unic-devel:
    crate(validator/unic)
    rust-validator+unic-devel

rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel:
    crate(validator/unic-ucd-common)
    rust-validator+unic-ucd-common-devel

rust-validator+validator_derive-devel:
    crate(validator/validator_derive)
    rust-validator+validator_derive-devel



Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2453355
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Python, Java, fonts, Ocaml, SugarActivity, C/C++, Haskell, PHP, Perl, R
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 4 Cristian Le 2026-04-15 11:41:02 UTC
I have mixed up the reviews, the correct review text for this one is in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2453355#c3

Comment 5 Ben Beasley 2026-04-15 11:58:11 UTC
Thank you for the review!

> - Non-blocker, but this one pulls in 2 compat crates, just an fyi

I see only rust-darling{,_core_,macro}0.20. The rust-proc-macro{,-error,-error-attr}2 dependencies look like compat packages, but the "2" is part of the crate names. Am I missing anything else?

It does look like I can update the darling dependency, https://github.com/Keats/validator/pull/394, so I’ll adjust that on import.

https://release-monitoring.org/project/389601/

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-04-15 11:59:24 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-validator_derive

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2026-04-15 12:12:50 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c8bbefc8fc (rust-validator_derive-0.20.0-2.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c8bbefc8fc

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2026-04-15 12:17:57 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c8bbefc8fc (rust-validator_derive-0.20.0-2.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.