Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 245657 - f-spot packaging issue
f-spot packaging issue
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: f-spot (Show other bugs)
7
i386 Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Christopher Aillon
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-06-25 17:52 EDT by Waclaw Sierek
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-26 18:05:28 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Waclaw Sierek 2007-06-25 17:52:13 EDT 
f-spot depends on mono-data-sqlite, which is not included properly on dependency
list.
If you don't install mono-data-sqlite manually, f-spot will not run - it will
complain about missing Mono.Data.SqliteClient assembly.
Comment 1 Christopher Aillon 2007-06-25 21:39:39 EDT 
The following commands imply that the package is correct... Appears your
dependencies got messed up somehow....

% rpm -q --provides mono-data-sqlite
mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient) = 1.0.5000.0
mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient) = 2.0.0.0
mono-data-sqlite = 1.2.3-3.fc7
% rpm -q --requires f-spot | grep Sqlite
mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient) = 2.0.0.0
% rpm -q f-spot
f-spot-0.3.5-2.fc7
Comment 2 Waclaw Sierek 2007-06-26 18:05:28 EDT 
Oops, I should have check that myself instead of posting a bug in the middle of
night.
My installation does seem a bit inconsistent
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient)'
mono-data-sqlite-1.2.3-3.fc7
mono-data-sqlite-1.2.3-3.fc7

I see the package mentioned twice.

I guess you shall close this bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.