Bug 2458075 - Review Request: ocaml-yamlx - Pure OCaml YAML 1.2 parser with lossless comment-preserving AST
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-yamlx - Pure OCaml YAML 1.2 parser with lossless commen...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Richard W.M. Jones
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://mjambon.github.io/yamlx/
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2457339
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-04-13 22:27 UTC by Jerry James
Modified: 2026-04-28 01:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-04-28 01:32:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
rjones: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jerry James 2026-04-13 22:27:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-yamlx/ocaml-yamlx.spec
SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-yamlx/ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: jjames
Description: A pure-OCaml YAML 1.2 and 1.1 library with a lossless, comment-preserving AST.
Features:

- Full YAML 1.2 compliance — passes all 371 tests from the yaml-test-suite.
- Pure OCaml — no C bindings, no external runtime dependencies.
- Lossless AST — the parsed node tree preserves scalar styles (plain,
  'single-quoted', "double-quoted", | literal, > folded), flow vs. block
  collection style, tags, anchors, and source positions.
- Best-effort comment preservation — standalone (head) comments before a node,
  inline (line) comments after a value, and trailing (foot) comments after the
  last item of a block collection are attached to the nearest node and
  re-emitted by the printer.
- Pretty-printer — `Nodes.to_yaml` serializes a node list back to a YAML
  string, preserving all of the above.
- Plain-YAML printer — `Nodes.to_plain_yaml_exn` produces a restricted subset
  with no anchors, no aliases (expanded inline), no tags, no flow collections,
  and no complex mapping keys — the fragment of YAML that most people
  recognize on sight.
- Typed-value resolver — `Values.of_yaml` applies the YAML 1.2 JSON schema and
  returns value list with `Null | Bool | Int | Float | String | Seq | Map`
  constructors.
- Multi-document streams — both the node and value APIs handle streams
  containing more than one ----separated document.
- Correct anchor scoping — anchors are document-local; an alias in document N
  cannot refer to an anchor defined in document N−1.
- Structured errors — `Scan_error` and `Parse_error` carry a pos record with
  line, column, and byte offset.  `catch_errors` wraps any of these into a
  `(_, string)` result with a human-readable message, optionally prefixed with
  a file name.
- Command-line tool — the yamlx binary reads YAML from a file or stdin and
  prints it in one of several formats.

This package is part of an update affecting many OCaml packages; see https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/OCaml/builds/ for package builds.

I am willing to swap reviews.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-13 22:29:57 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10320908
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2458075-ocaml-yamlx/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10320908-ocaml-yamlx/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Jerry James 2026-04-15 01:04:27 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-15 03:37:58 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10326560
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2458075-ocaml-yamlx/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10326560-ocaml-yamlx/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Richard W.M. Jones 2026-04-15 18:38:39 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

RWMJ: There is no C or C++ code directly found.  The OCaml compiler will
run GCC, but the compiler ought to pull that in via a dependency.  So
I don't understand the issue here, I think it's a false positive.


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

RWMJ: This section seems irrelevant, see above.

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.

RWMJ: A lot of AI-generated code, but hey.

[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General
     Public License", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General Public License
     v3.0", "GNU Affero General Public License v3.0", "*No copyright* GNU
     Affero General Public License v3.0 [generated file]", "BSD 3-Clause
     License", "ISC License", "MIT License". 437 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
     rpmbuild/results/ocaml-yamlx/licensecheck.txt

RWMJ: The intention is obviously that the code in total is licensed under AGPL.
License notices on individual files are missing in most cases, but the
intention is still clear.

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.

RWMJ: Uses dune which should honour the flags.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.

RWMJ: Uses autochangelog

[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 11036 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.

RWMJ: I rebuilt it in mock.

[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.

RWMJ: Latest is 0.1.0, same as packaged.

[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.

RWMJ: No signature that I can find.

[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm
          ocaml-yamlx-devel-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm
          ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5zsdsajp')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('exn', '%description -l en_US exn -> ex, en, exon')
ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('pos', '%description -l en_US pos -> pews, ops, sop')
ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('stdin', '%description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio')
ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('exn', '%description -l en_US exn -> ex, en, exon')
ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pos', '%description -l en_US pos -> pews, ops, sop')
ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stdin', '%description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio')

RWMJ: These are fine.

ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yamlx

RWMJ: It would be nice, but there isn't one upstream

ocaml-yamlx-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

RWMJ: Docs are in *.mli files & online.

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 2 warnings, 11 filtered, 6 badness; has taken 0.7 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: ocaml-yamlx-debuginfo-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_2ykh3mf')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 11 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx-debuginfo".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx".
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.9.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx-devel".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/mjambon/yamlx/archive/0.1.0/yamlx-0.1.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 91b06a9c96d6dc32cdbc849343ef605a39e82888ddb5249af96ef1ec8215f854
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 91b06a9c96d6dc32cdbc849343ef605a39e82888ddb5249af96ef1ec8215f854


Requires
--------
ocaml-yamlx (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    glibc
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics)
    ocaml(CamlinternalLazy)
    ocaml(Ppx_deriving_runtime)
    ocaml(Stdlib)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Array)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Bool)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Bytes)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Char)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Domain)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Either)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Float)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Format)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Fun)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Int32)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Int64)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy)
    ocaml(Stdlib__List)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Obj)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Option)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Printf)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Queue)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Result)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Seq)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Set)
    ocaml(Stdlib__String)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar)
    ocaml(YAMLx__)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Types)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

ocaml-yamlx-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics)
    ocaml(CamlinternalLazy)
    ocaml(Ppx_deriving_runtime)
    ocaml(Stdlib)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Array)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Bool)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Bytes)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Char)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Domain)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Either)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Float)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Format)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Fun)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Int32)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Int64)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy)
    ocaml(Stdlib__List)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Obj)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Option)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Printf)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Queue)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Result)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Seq)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Set)
    ocaml(Stdlib__String)
    ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar)
    ocaml(YAMLx__)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Types)
    ocaml-yamlx(x86-64)
    ocamlx(CamlinternalFormat)
    ocamlx(CamlinternalLazy)
    ocamlx(Stdlib)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Array)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Atomic)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Bool)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Buffer)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Bytes)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Char)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Domain)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Float)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Format)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Fun)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Hashtbl)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Int64)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Lazy)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__List)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Option)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Printexc)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Printf)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Queue)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Random)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Seq)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__Set)
    ocamlx(Stdlib__String)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Types)



Provides
--------
ocaml-yamlx:
    ocaml(YAMLx)
    ocaml(YAMLx__)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Types)
    ocaml-yamlx
    ocaml-yamlx(x86-64)

ocaml-yamlx-devel:
    ocaml(YAMLx)
    ocaml(YAMLx__)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocaml(YAMLx__Types)
    ocaml-yamlx-devel
    ocaml-yamlx-devel(x86-64)
    ocamlx(YAMLx)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Char_class)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Comment_attacher)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Composer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Event_printer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__List_ext)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Parser)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Printer)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Reader)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Resolver)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Scanner)
    ocamlx(YAMLx__Types)


RWMJ: Requires/provides look fine.


Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name ocaml-yamlx --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Ocaml, C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Perl, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Java, Python, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 5 Richard W.M. Jones 2026-04-15 18:39:14 UTC
*** This package is APPROVED by rwmj ****

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-04-16 19:26:33 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-yamlx

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-04-17 00:46:26 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-yamlx
Monitoring:
Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-04-17 00:51:41 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-yamlx
Monitoring:
Anitya project is accessible by this link 
`https://release-monitoring.org/project/389626`
 you can modify it manually.
Package wasn't created in Anitya, reason: `Bad Request, some necessary arguments were not provided.`.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2026-04-17 18:08:26 UTC
FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce (ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-04-18 01:33:50 UTC
FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-04-28 01:32:19 UTC
FEDORA-2026-b40adde7ce (ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.