Bug 2459326 - Review Request: python-flask-multipass - Provides Flask with a user authentication/identity system
Summary: Review Request: python-flask-multipass - Provides Flask with a user authentic...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: 45
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://flask-multipass.readthedocs.i...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-04-17 21:46 UTC by andrii.verbytskyi
Modified: 2026-07-14 11:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10345417 to 10348318 (651 bytes, patch)
2026-04-20 12:00 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10359678 to 10361215 (3.88 KB, patch)
2026-04-23 21:24 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description andrii.verbytskyi 2026-04-17 21:46:33 UTC
Flask-Multipass provides Flask with a user authentication/identity 
system which can use different backends (such as local users, LDAP and OAuth) simultaneously.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-18 02:33:28 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:

    Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>

Found:

    Flask-Multipass provides Flask with a user authentication/identity  system

As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 andrii.verbytskyi 2026-04-18 07:17:04 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-19 02:33:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10345417
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2459326-flask-multipass/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10345417-python-Flask-Multipass/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Not a valid SPDX expression 'BSD'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-20 12:00:31 UTC
Created attachment 2137684 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10345417 to 10348318

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-20 12:00:34 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10348318
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2459326-flask-multipass/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10348318-python-Flask-Multipass/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-23 10:54:21 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10359678
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2459326-python-flask-multipass/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10359678-python-Flask-Multipass/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-23 21:24:17 UTC
Created attachment 2138087 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10359678 to 10361215

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-23 21:24:19 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10361215
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2459326-python-flask-multipass/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10361215-python-flask-multipass/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 13 Ben Beasley 2026-06-23 11:29:51 UTC
The spec file and source RPM links give a 404 error because COPR has garbage-collected the build. Please consider putting your submission somewhere more durable, like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.