Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/python-bayesml.spec srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/python-bayesml-0.4.1%5E20260429gitae8bcdd-1.fc43.src.rpm description: BayesML contributes to wide society thourgh promoting education, research, and application of machine learning based on Bayesian statistics and Bayesian decision theory. Characteristics Easy-to-use: You can use pre-defined Bayesian statistical models by simply importing it. You don't need to define models yourself like PyMC or Stan. Bayesian Decision Theoretic API: BayesML's API corresponds to the structure of decision-making based on Bayesian decision theory. Bayesian decision theory is a unified framework for handling various decision-making processes, such as parameter estimation and prediction of new data. Therefore, BayesML enables intuitive operations for a wider range of decision-making compared to the fit-predict type API adopted in libraries like scikit-learn. Moreover, many of our models also implement fit-predict functions. Model Visualization Functions: All packages have methods to visualize the probabilistic data generative model, generated data from that model, and the posterior distribution learned from the data in 2~3 dimensional space. Thus, you can effectively understand the characteristics of probabilistic data generative models and algorithms through the generation of synthetic data and learning from them. Fast Algorithms Using Conjugate Prior Distributions: Many of our learning algorithms adopt exact calculation methods or variational Bayesian methods that effectively use the conjugacy between probabilistic data generative models and prior distributions. Therefore, they are much faster than general-purpose MCMC methods and are also suitable for online learning. Although some algorithms adopt MCMC methods, but they use MCMC methods specialized for each model, taking advantage of conjugacy. fas: fed500 Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10406650 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2463833-python-bayesml/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10406650-python-bayesml/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Approved. I don't really love the approach to building the docs there, but I can't come up with anything better. You should add %license LICENSE.txt, but happy for you to do that during import. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License", "MIT License", "SIL Open Font License 1.1". 338 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python- bayesml/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.15, /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 12739 bytes in 1 files. I don't think there's enough here to need a separate -doc package. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.