Bug 2464801 - Review Request: pi-coding-agent - An open source coding agent
Summary: Review Request: pi-coding-agent - An open source coding agent
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/earendil-works/pi
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-05-03 21:11 UTC by Tom.Rix
Modified: 2026-06-05 07:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
Tom.Rix: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-05-04 08:26:49 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Tom.Rix 2026-05-14 17:45:04 UTC
How to use pi-coding agent is written up here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/AI-ML#pi-coding-agent

Comment 3 Tom.Rix 2026-06-04 23:05:45 UTC
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/pi-coding-agent.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/pi-coding-agent-0.78.1-1.fc45.src.rpm

Upstream location changed, this is the latest.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-05 07:09:24 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10569915
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2464801-pi-coding-agent/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10569915-pi-coding-agent/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.