Bug 246722 - backport receive window mgmt code to for SCTP to RHEL5
Summary: backport receive window mgmt code to for SCTP to RHEL5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Neil Horman
QA Contact: Martin Jenner
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 210208 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 246139 249316 251036 296411 372911 420521 422431 422441
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-07-04 13:30 UTC by Neil Horman
Modified: 2018-10-19 20:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0314
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 14:45:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0314 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Updated kernel packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 2008-05-20 18:43:34 UTC

Description Neil Horman 2007-07-04 13:30:13 UTC
Description of problem:
The current RHEL5 sctp implementation has a problem in which an associations
receive memory can be exhausted prior to its rwnd closing.  I've fixed it
upstream and it needs to be backported

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-07-04 13:35:51 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Neil Horman 2007-08-29 14:43:08 UTC
*** Bug 210208 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Russell Doty 2007-08-31 17:17:45 UTC
Since Bug 210208 was closed as a duplicate, I am moving all of the RHEL 5.2
request settings to this BZ.

Comment 5 Don Zickus 2007-11-29 17:06:19 UTC
in 2.6.18-58.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 6 Issue Tracker 2007-12-04 20:08:26 UTC
Ran a quick iperftp test on CPI1 installed by Patrick.

Linux stitch-1-2.testing.local 2.6.18-58.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 17:15:24
EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
1 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  0.09 MBytes  0.25 Mbits/sec
2 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  0.18 MBytes  0.51 Mbits/sec
4 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  0.32 MBytes  0.89 Mbits/sec
8 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  0.74 MBytes  2.07 Mbits/sec
16 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  1.47 MBytes  4.10 Mbits/sec
32 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  2.44 MBytes  6.82 Mbits/sec
64 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  5.01 MBytes  14.0 Mbits/sec
128 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  11.7 MBytes  32.6 Mbits/sec
256 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  23.0 MBytes  64.3 Mbits/sec
512 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  44.7 MBytes    125 Mbits/sec
1024 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  89.9 MBytes    251 Mbits/sec
2048 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec    172 MBytes    480 Mbits/sec
4096 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec    316 MBytes    883 Mbits/sec
8192 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec    529 MBytes  1480 Mbits/sec
16384 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec    802 MBytes  2242 Mbits/sec
32768 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  2.22 MBytes  6.20 Mbits/sec
65536 bytes : [  3]  3.0- 6.0 sec  0.50 MBytes  1.40 Mbits/sec

This time I'm getting some problems with 32K messages also, which makes
no sense to me as the default receive buffer seems to be bigger (in
/proc/sys/net/sctp/sctp_rmem) than it used to be.

Internal Status set to 'Waiting on Support'
Status set to: Waiting on Tech

This event sent from IssueTracker by streeter 
 issue 103872

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 14:45:24 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.