Bug 2467933 - Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-wireguard - rust netlink packet parsing/emitting of wireguard
Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-wireguard - rust netlink packet parsing/e...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2467908
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-05-08 04:46 UTC by Gris Ge
Modified: 2026-06-17 08:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gris Ge 2026-05-08 04:46:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cathay4t/new_rpms/rust-netlink-packet-wireguard.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~cathay4t/new_rpms/rust-netlink-packet-wireguard-0.3.1-1.fc45.src.rpm
Description: Rust netlink packet parsing and emitting crate for wireguard
Fedora Account System Username: cathay4t

Comment 1 Gris Ge 2026-05-08 04:48:27 UTC
This is required for existing package nispor to upgrade to 2.0.2 through rust-nl-wireguard in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467908

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2026-06-16 13:22:16 UTC
> Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(pretty_assertions/default) >= 0.7.2 with crate(pretty_assertions/default) < 0.8.0~)

Can this be patched (ideally, sending the patch upstream) to use pretty_assertions 1.x?

I also notice that version 0.4.0 was released shortly after you submitted this request, but it’s justifiable to still package 0.3.1 if that’s what nl-wireguard needs.

Comment 4 Gris Ge 2026-06-17 08:00:23 UTC
Thanks for the review. Let me tag new release in upstream and update here this weekend.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.