Bug 246891 - Initscript Review - conman
Summary: Initscript Review - conman
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: conman
Version: 12
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Steven M. Parrish
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: InitscriptStatus InitScriptsProject
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-07-05 13:48 UTC by Harald Hoyer
Modified: 2010-12-05 07:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-12-05 07:15:40 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Harald Hoyer 2007-07-05 13:48:24 UTC
Please have a look at the wikipage 
and change your initscripts to comply with the LSB standard.
Especially check the exit status and add a LSB Header.
E.g. starting a service should return with 0, if the service is already running and stopping a stopped service should also return with 0.

Also check, if your service has to be _on_ per default, and turn it off in the old chkconfig line, if not.

Thank you.

Comment 1 Jarod Wilson 2008-02-26 17:41:39 UTC
Setting to NEEDINFO, mostly just to get it the heck out of my default bugzilla
query until someone figures out what we're actually doing on this front (if

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 03:01:45 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 3 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-09 18:02:32 UTC
Nggh. Stupid bug zapper...

Comment 4 Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-07 22:59:37 UTC
Rebasing to F11 until I have a chance to look at this.

Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team

Comment 5 Michal Nowak 2009-09-04 08:29:42 UTC
I made a review of the init script and this is the only thing I guess is not complying with Fedora Initscripts Guidelines. Any other thoughts?

∘ missing condrestart in *) target

Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 07:56:12 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2010-11-04 12:09:20 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '12'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 

Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2010-12-05 07:15:40 UTC
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.