Bug 247495 - update fails for libupnp because of vlc dependency of libupnp.so.2
Summary: update fails for libupnp because of vlc dependency of libupnp.so.2
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libupnp   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Eric Tanguy
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-07-09 16:31 UTC by Philip Goisman
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-07-09 16:35:35 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Philip Goisman 2007-07-09 16:31:15 UTC
Description of problem:
vlc (vlc-0.8.6a-4.fc6) requires libupnp.so.2
The update wants to install libupnp.so.3 with an update of ushare.
I need vlc for video.  So removing vlc kills my video.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
With vlc and libupnp.so.2 installed try a yum update.  You'll get an update

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
update conflict

Expected results:
update of libupnp.so.3 will also update vlc

Additional info:
I can exclude updates for ushare and libupnp, but I'd rather get all updates to
include an update for vlc.

Comment 1 Eric Tanguy 2007-07-09 16:35:35 UTC
vlc-0.8.6c-2.lvn7 requires libupnp.so.3 so please update vlc from livna.

Comment 2 Philip Goisman 2007-07-09 20:00:33 UTC
I would have thought a fc6 component would require a fc6 update.  Why does the
livna component replace the fc6 component, i.e.,vlc-0.8.6c-2.lvn7 replace
vlc-0.8.6a-4.fc6?  This substitution causes the following problem:

Error: Missing Dependency: faad2 < 2.5 is needed by package ffmpeg-libs

faad2-2.5-2.fc6 is presently installed.

In the past it has been reported livna packages may be incompatible with some 
fc packages.  Why can't fc update their own package?

Comment 3 Eric Tanguy 2007-07-09 20:27:27 UTC
Sorry you are right. I made a confusion between FC-6 and F-7. But where this vlc
package come from ?? Please use packages from livna for FC-6 you will find
vlc-0.8.6c-2.lvn6.i386.rpm. Please fill a bug against the vlc package if needed
and use usual repo before fill in a bug.

Comment 4 Philip Goisman 2007-07-09 22:30:46 UTC
Actually, I made a mistake.  Sorry for the confusion.  The vlc package I used
came from freshrpms.  I assumed - incorrectly - that an extension of fc6 meant
it was a fc component.  I'll have to check out how to file a bug report to

Sorry again for wasting your time.  Thanks for the updates.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.