Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-kurbu5-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-kurbu5-sys-0.1.2-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: Fedora Account System Username: asn Co-Maintainer: abbra Package build order: Stage 1 (parallel) — no kurbu5 inter-deps: rust-kurbu5-sys, rust-kurbu5-derive, rust-kurbu5-kdb-derive, rust-kurbu5-kadm5-derive Stage 2 (parallel, after 1) — needs rust-kurbu5-sys-devel: rust-kurbu5-rs, rust-kurbu5-kdb-sys, rust-kurbu5-kadm5-sys Stage 3 (parallel, after 2) — needs Stage 2 -devel packages: rust-kurbu5-kdb-rs, rust-kurbu5-kadm5-rs All packages are built at: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/asn/kirmes/builds/
All kurbu5 packages: rust-kurbu5-sys: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479510 rust-kurbu5-derive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479511 rust-kurbu5-kdb-derive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479512 rust-kurbu5-kadm5-derive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479513 rust-kurbu5-rs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479514 rust-kurbu5-kdb-sys: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479515 rust-kurbu5-kadm5-sys: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479516 rust-kurbu5-kdb-rs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479517 rust-kurbu5-kadm5-rs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2479518
> Fedora Account System Username: abbra > Co-Maintainer: asn This likely won't work (at least not initially): The person who submits the package review request needs to be the same person who requests creation of the package and who will be "main" maintainer of it. This is also enforced by the service that processes dist-git repository creation requests. And "giving" the package to somebody else immediately after review *might* be OK but definitely not in line with the spirit of that rule. Let me know if you are OK with "asn" being the person who will request the dist-git repo creation and who will become main admin of the package. Otherwise abbra will need to resubmit the package review requests from his own bugzilla account.
I'm fine being the main maintainer at first.
Package looks good, with one caveat: Please exclude rust2rpm.toml and rust-kurbu5-sys.spec from the built packages. It might be good to drop these two files from upstream entirely (they're specific to Fedora downstream packaging after all), but until then, you can use this rust2rpm.toml snippet to exclude them: ``` [package] exclude-crate-files = ["rust2rpm.toml", "rust-kurbu5-sys.spec"] ```
Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-kurbu5-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-kurbu5-sys-0.1.2-2.fc45.src.rpm
Thanks, looks good to me now. Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide ✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass: there are no tests. ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora ✅ license file is included with %license in %files ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-kurbu5-sys Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`
FEDORA-2026-311bad7901 (rust-kurbu5-sys-0.1.2-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-311bad7901
FEDORA-2026-311bad7901 (rust-kurbu5-sys-0.1.2-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.