Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/libplutobook.spec srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/libplutobook-0.17.0-1.fc43.src.rpm description: PlutoBook is a robust HTML rendering library tailored for paged media. It takes HTML or XML as input, applies CSS stylesheets, and lays out elements across one or more pages, which can then be rendered as Bitmap images or PDF documents. fas: fed500 Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10493248 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2480534-libplutobook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10493248-libplutobook/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 2.0", "*No copyright* MIT License", "Mozilla Public License 2.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License and/or GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 1.1", "curl License", "MIT License", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer - sell variant and/or MIT (old) and/or NTP License (legal disclaimer)", "Freetype Project License", "MIT (old)", "Unicode License Agreement - Data Files and Software (2016)", "BSD 3-Clause License", "MIT License and/or The Unlicense". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/yppy/Code/Fedora/2480534-libplutobook/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 58203 bytes in 4 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libplutobook-0.17.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-devel-0.17.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-0.17.0-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp2weg_kpi')] checks: 32, packages: 3 libplutobook.src: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2pdf libplutobook.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2png 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 28 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libplutobook-debuginfo-0.17.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp4b2kr0wi')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 13 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 libplutobook.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2pdf libplutobook.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2png 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings, 39 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.6 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/plutoprint/plutobook/archive/v0.17.0/plutobook-0.17.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 987374e3779f147ef5108780e90960e1d2d1aae8c9361ba1d418c8649a3ac947 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 987374e3779f147ef5108780e90960e1d2d1aae8c9361ba1d418c8649a3ac947 Requires -------- libplutobook (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libexpat.so.1()(64bit) libexpat.so.1(LIBEXPAT_1.0.0)(64bit) libexpat.so.1(LIBEXPAT_1.1.0)(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libharfbuzz.so.0()(64bit) libicui18n.so.77()(64bit) libicuuc.so.77()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.7)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0()(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0(TURBOJPEG_1.0)(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0(TURBOJPEG_1.2)(64bit) libwebp.so.7()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libplutobook-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libplutobook(x86-64) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(cairo) pkgconfig(cairo-fc) pkgconfig(cairo-ft) pkgconfig(cairo-pdf) pkgconfig(cairo-png) pkgconfig(expat) pkgconfig(fontconfig) pkgconfig(freetype2) pkgconfig(harfbuzz) pkgconfig(icu-i18n) pkgconfig(icu-uc) pkgconfig(libcurl) pkgconfig(libturbojpeg) pkgconfig(libwebp) Provides -------- libplutobook: libplutobook libplutobook(x86-64) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) libplutobook-devel: libplutobook-devel libplutobook-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(plutobook) Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2480534 -m fedora-44-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-44-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Ocaml, fonts, R, Python, PHP, Java, SugarActivity, Haskell, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) html2pdf and html2png should be in a subpackage per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_mixed_use_packages
Thanks for the review. Updated: spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/libplutobook.spec srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/libplutobook-0.18.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 2.0", "*No copyright* MIT License", "Mozilla Public License 2.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License and/or GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 1.1", "curl License", "MIT License", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer - sell variant and/or MIT (old) and/or NTP License (legal disclaimer)", "Freetype Project License", "MIT (old)", "Unicode License Agreement - Data Files and Software (2016)", "BSD 3-Clause License", "MIT License and/or The Unlicense". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/yppy/Code/Fedora/libplutobook/2480534-libplutobook/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 59960 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libplutobook-0.18.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-devel-0.18.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-utilities-0.18.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-0.18.0-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpy1qv3ada')] checks: 32, packages: 4 libplutobook.src: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('html', 'Summary(en_US) html -> HTML') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pdf', 'Summary(en_US) pdf -> PDF, pd, pf') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('png', 'Summary(en_US) png -> pg, ping, pang') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('html', '%description -l en_US html -> HTML') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pdf', '%description -l en_US pdf -> PDF, pd, pf') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('png', '%description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2pdf libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2png 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings, 30 filtered, 8 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libplutobook-utilities-debuginfo-0.18.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm libplutobook-debuginfo-0.18.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpweyaa9mb')] checks: 32, packages: 2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 5 libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('html', 'Summary(en_US) html -> HTML') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pdf', 'Summary(en_US) pdf -> PDF, pd, pf') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('png', 'Summary(en_US) png -> pg, ping, pang') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('html', '%description -l en_US html -> HTML') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pdf', '%description -l en_US pdf -> PDF, pd, pf') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('png', '%description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang') libplutobook.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stylesheets', '%description -l en_US stylesheets -> style sheets, style-sheets, dustsheets') libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2pdf libplutobook-utilities.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary html2png 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings, 45 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 0.6 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/plutoprint/plutobook/archive/v0.18.0/plutobook-0.18.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 3d6106ff2890fc605881a4034c87da2ae8f79108b67228ab5c3fe9c7d96d78a2 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3d6106ff2890fc605881a4034c87da2ae8f79108b67228ab5c3fe9c7d96d78a2 Requires -------- libplutobook (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libexpat.so.1()(64bit) libexpat.so.1(LIBEXPAT_1.0.0)(64bit) libexpat.so.1(LIBEXPAT_1.1.0)(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libharfbuzz.so.0()(64bit) libicui18n.so.77()(64bit) libicuuc.so.77()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.7)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0()(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0(TURBOJPEG_1.0)(64bit) libturbojpeg.so.0(TURBOJPEG_1.2)(64bit) libwebp.so.7()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libplutobook-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libplutobook(x86-64) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(cairo) pkgconfig(cairo-fc) pkgconfig(cairo-ft) pkgconfig(cairo-pdf) pkgconfig(cairo-png) pkgconfig(expat) pkgconfig(fontconfig) pkgconfig(freetype2) pkgconfig(harfbuzz) pkgconfig(icu-i18n) pkgconfig(icu-uc) pkgconfig(libcurl) pkgconfig(libturbojpeg) pkgconfig(libwebp) libplutobook-utilities (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libplutobook(x86-64) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- libplutobook: libplutobook libplutobook(x86-64) libplutobook.so.0()(64bit) libplutobook-devel: libplutobook-devel libplutobook-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(plutobook) libplutobook-utilities: libplutobook-utilities libplutobook-utilities(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-44-x86_64 -b 2480534 Buildroot used: fedora-44-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic Disabled plugins: Ocaml, R, Java, fonts, PHP, Haskell, SugarActivity, Perl, Python Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Comments: a) Approved. b) -utilities is an unconventional name for the subpackage, normally it is -utils or -tools. c) The upstream name is plutobook rather than libplutobook, but I guess that is up to your preference.