Bug 2481894 (CVE-2026-42770) - CVE-2026-42770 openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q
Summary: CVE-2026-42770 openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-42770
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-05-27 14:21 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-06-18 10:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26057 0 None None None 2026-06-15 20:24:41 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26059 0 None None None 2026-06-15 20:50:04 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26280 0 None None None 2026-06-16 12:32:34 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26291 0 None None None 2026-06-16 11:56:10 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26303 0 None None None 2026-06-16 12:09:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26394 0 None None None 2026-06-16 15:18:39 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:26554 0 None None None 2026-06-17 13:40:30 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2026:27072 0 None None None 2026-06-18 10:41:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:25237 0 None None None 2026-06-11 12:32:05 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:25239 0 None None None 2026-06-11 12:34:58 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-05-27 14:21:03 UTC
FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (CVE-2026-42770)
Severity: Low

Issue summary: When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42)
peer key, the peer key is not properly checked for the subgroup membership.

Impact summary: A malicious peer which presents an X9.42 key carrying the
victim's p and g parameters, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the
cofactor (p−1)/q_local), and a public value Y of order r can recover the
victim's private key after a small number of key exchange attempts. When
EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the
subgroup membership check Y^q ≡ 1 (mod p) is performed using the peer's
own q parameter, not the local key's q. The peer's domain parameters are
then matched against the domain parameters of the private key, but the value
of q is not compared.

A malicious peer who presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p, g,
a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor), and a public
value Y of order r passes all checks. The shared secret then takes only
r distinct values, leaking priv mod r. Repeating for each small-prime
factor of the cofactor and combining via CRT recovers the full private
key (Lim–Lee / small-subgroup-confinement attack).

The realistic attack surface is narrow: principally CMP deployments with
long-lived RA/CA DHX keys and bespoke enterprise or government applications
using X9.42 DHX static keys with interactive protocols and therefore this
issue was assigned Low severity.

The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are affected by this
issue.

OpenSSL 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.1.
OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.3.
OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.7.
OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.6.
OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.21.

This issue was reported on 16th April 2026 by Alex Gaynor (Anthropic).
The fix was developed by Alex Gaynor (Anthropic), Viktor Dukhovni and Norbert
Pocs.

Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2026-06-11 12:32:04 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:25237 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25237

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2026-06-11 12:34:57 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:25239 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25239


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.