Bug 248557 - rtcheck package uses /sbin/rtcheck instead of /usr/bin/rtcheck
Summary: rtcheck package uses /sbin/rtcheck instead of /usr/bin/rtcheck
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG
Classification: Red Hat
Component: realtime-kernel
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-07-17 14:06 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2008-02-27 19:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 0.6.4-2.el5rt
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-26 14:25:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 36464 0 None None None Never

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2007-07-17 14:06:50 UTC
LTC Owner is: nivedita.com
LTC Originator is: jstultz.com


The rtcheck-0.6.4-1.el5rt package puts the rtcheck binary in /sbin/ rather then
/usr/bin/. 

This is problematic as rtcheck needs to be in the standard user path, as regular
users will invoke it when running the JVM.

The rtcheck binary just needs to be moved to /usr/bin/ or some other location in
the standard user path.

Comment 1 Tim Chavez 2007-07-23 20:40:06 UTC
Where as I agree it should probably move into a standard user path, I believe
the JVM calls it explicitly from /usr/local/bin right?  I'm not 100% this is
true.  Something worth asking John Kacur.

Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2007-07-30 21:10:35 UTC
changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|OPEN                        |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From jstultz.com (prefers email at johnstul.com)  2007-07-30 17:08 EDT -------
Package has updated w/ /usr/bin/rtcheck. 

Tested JVM run to verify it works and it appears to work fine. Marking fixed and
accepted. 

Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2007-11-28 18:50:34 UTC
------- Comment From nivedita.com 2007-11-28 13:46 EDT-------
Upping severity to match priority set by development team.

Comment 4 Luis Claudio R. Goncalves 2007-11-28 19:17:00 UTC
Hi, I understood that the fix had been already tested and approved in
comment#2... anyway, this has been fixed some time ago:

[lclaudio@lab linux-2.6.21.x86_64]$ rpm -q rtcheck
rtcheck-0.6.4-2.el5rt.x86_64
[lclaudio@lab linux-2.6.21.x86_64]$ rpm -qi rtcheck | grep "Build Date"
Release     : 2.el5rt                       Build Date: Tue 24 Jul 2007 04:17:31
PM BRT

[lclaudio@lab linux-2.6.21.x86_64]$ rpm -ql rtcheck
/etc/rc.d/init.d/rtcheck
/usr/bin/rtcheck
/usr/share/doc/rtcheck-0.6.4
/usr/share/doc/rtcheck-0.6.4/README
[lclaudio@lab linux-2.6.21.x86_64]$ 


Comment 5 IBM Bug Proxy 2007-11-28 19:25:34 UTC
------- Comment From nivedita.com 2007-11-28 14:23 EDT-------
Er, yes, I should have marked that internal only. I was just closing up
and cleaning loose ends. We keep the bugs open in this project until
the release actually goes out :). It was in TESTED/ACCEPTED state. No
new info here, just a correction on what the severity should have been.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.