Fedora 7 includeds xerces-c, xerces-c-devel & xerces-c-doc. These are great and very useful. Fedora 7 also includes xalan-j. Unfortunately xalan-c is not included. It seems like xalan-c would be a good fit and make an nice addition to the list of support packages.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/xalan-c.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/xalan-c-1.10.0-2.fc8.x86_64/xalan-c-1.10.0-2.fc8.src.rpm mock results: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/xalan-c-1.10.0-2.fc8.x86_64/ Description: Xalan XSLT processor for C xalan-c is a robust implementation of the W3C Recommendations for XSL Transformations (XSLT) and the XML Path Language (XPath).
I would be happy to review this... Lubomir: You are the submitter here? Look for a full review in a bit.
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (ASL 2.0) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 0a3fbb535885531cc544b07a2060bfb1 Xalan-C_1_10_0-src.tar.gz 0a3fbb535885531cc544b07a2060bfb1 Xalan-C_1_10_0-src.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: Non blocker issues to note: - Might ask upsteam to not ship CVS dirs in their release tar to avoid you having to remove them. - The upstream web page confusingly calls this "Xalan-C++", even tho the release tar, download dirs and other places call it xalan-c. Perhaps ask them which it really should be? 1. rpmlint says: ignore: xalan-c-devel.i386: W: no-documentation Perhaps this tar.gz should be unpacked? Or is it needed in that format as part of docs? xalan-c-doc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xalan-c-doc-1.10.0/xdocs/xml-site-style.tar.gz If possible, docs should be readonly... xalan-c-doc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xalan-c-doc-1.10.0/samples/configure xalan-c-doc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xalan-c-doc-1.10.0/samples/runConfigure xalan-c-doc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xalan-c-doc-1.10.0/xdocs/run xalan-c-doc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xalan-c-doc-1.10.0/samples/configure.in Those items are quite minor however, so if you could look into them before importing that would be fine. This package is APPROVED.
If you're interested in cross-checking things, I have an old, currently unmaintained package of this available at http://cachalot.mine.nu/unmaintained/xalan-c-1.10-0.3.cmn7.src.rpm
Heh, I forgot to add myself to CC, I found this again just by accident :) Kevin, thanks for the review, especially for the notes about the documentation -- they're valuable to me as I was not sure how to handle it. I'll look at those issues in detail tomorrow, and will also ask upstream about the packaging weirdnesses. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xalan-c Short Description: Xalan XSLT processor for C Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes
cvs done.
Thanks, Kevin! Imported and built for all branches.
Suggestion about CVS dir inclusion and the project name were forwarded upstream.