Bug 2486352 - Review Request: olla - A proxy and load balancer for LLM infrastructure
Summary: Review Request: olla - A proxy and load balancer for LLM infrastructure
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: blinxen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-06-08 13:45 UTC by Tom.Rix
Modified: 2026-07-01 21:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
Tom.Rix: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10579177 to 10622240 (2.17 KB, patch)
2026-06-21 18:01 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-08 14:44:15 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10579177
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2486352-olla/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10579177-olla/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Tom.Rix 2026-06-21 17:57:05 UTC
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/olla.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/olla-0.0.28-1.fc45.src.rpm

Updated to 0.28
Added systemd support

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-21 18:01:59 UTC
Created attachment 2146163 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10579177 to 10622240

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-06-21 18:02:02 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10622240
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2486352-olla/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10622240-olla/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 blinxen 2026-06-29 22:31:31 UTC
Here are my initial remarks (not really blocking):

1. Is there a need to put systemd integration behind a flag for Fedora? It looks like much noise and I don't really see a benefit there.

2. The "olla.service" file sets the target to "default.target". However, that usually is just a symlink to "graphical.target". The docs [1] also suggest using "graphical.target" directly. Any reason for choosing "default.target" over "graphical.target"?

3. Please use "%{_sharedstatedir}" instead of "%{_var}/lib"

4. Why did you put the configuration files in "%{_var}/lib/olla" instead of "%{_sysconfdir}/olla"?

5. Why did you configure the log directory to be "/var/lib/olla/logs" instead of "/var/log/olla"?

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Systemd/

Comment 6 Tom.Rix 2026-07-01 21:22:27 UTC
1. Is there a need to put systemd integration behind a flag for Fedora? It looks like much noise and I don't really see a benefit there.

ok.

2. The "olla.service" file sets the target to "default.target". However, that usually is just a symlink to "graphical.target". The docs [1] also suggest using "graphical.target" directly. Any reason for choosing "default.target" over "graphical.target"?

or multi-user.target, which is also a symlink to default.
This is network application, it could be run in the gui-less server.
 

3. Please use "%{_sharedstatedir}" instead of "%{_var}/lib"

ok.

4. Why did you put the configuration files in "%{_var}/lib/olla" instead of "%{_sysconfdir}/olla"?
5. Why did you configure the log directory to be "/var/lib/olla/logs" instead of "/var/log/olla"?

To keep the dir created count down to 1.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.