Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-ureq.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-ureq-proto-0.6.0-1.fc44.src.rpm Description: Ureq support crate. Fedora Account System Username: music This is a new dependency for ureq v3, which is needed for cargo-deny v0.19.
Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-ureq-proto.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/rust-ureq-proto-0.6.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
The Cargo.toml says "MIT OR Apache-2.0" but the repository + crate + package only contain LICENSE-MIT.txt. This is handled correctly in `ureq` itself, so I'm not sure what went wrong there.
Good catch, thanks! New Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20260629/rust-ureq-proto.spec New SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20260629/rust-ureq-proto-0.6.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
Created attachment 2147077 [details] Configuration file for rust2rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10660904 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2493965-rust-ureq-proto/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10660904-rust-ureq-proto/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Looks good to me now, thanks! I think it's safe to assume that including the Apache-2.0 license text from ureq into ureq-proto should be fine, so I don't think we need to wait with approving this package review bug until the PR is merged upstream. === Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. ✅❌❓🫤 ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide ✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora 🫤 license file is included with %license in %files: Apache-2.0 license text seems to be missing accidentally from the upstream repo and published crates. The text is included from a "sibling" project (ureq -> ureq-proto) manually for now. A pull request to fix this missing license text was submitted. ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)
Thank you for the review! https://release-monitoring.org/project/390965/
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ureq-proto Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`
FEDORA-2026-49c2fcc4f5 (rust-ureq-proto-0.6.0-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-49c2fcc4f5
FEDORA-2026-49c2fcc4f5 (rust-ureq-proto-0.6.0-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.