Bug 2497055 - Review Request: fx - Terminal JSON viewer & processor
Summary: Review Request: fx - Terminal JSON viewer & processor
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-07-04 15:19 UTC by Emanuele Petriglia
Modified: 2026-07-24 22:09 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Emanuele Petriglia 2026-07-04 15:19:14 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/emape/fx/srpm-builds/10681573/fx.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/emape/fx/srpm-builds/10681573/fx-39.2.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description: Terminal JSON viewer & processor
Fedora Account System Username: emape

Hi, this is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. The original package was written in Node.js and has since been retired. It has now been ported to Go for a few years and I would like to add it to the Fedora packages again. I am not the author of the tool, just a user. I created the SRPM with the help of Mikel Olasagasti from this devel thread[0].

[0]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4OWRPSS3RJ5IENNWAQB57BCWDAC2BBUS/

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-07-04 17:35:14 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10681812
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2497055-fx/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10681812-fx/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fx
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2026-07-23 11:29:43 UTC
Hey, Emanuele. Please upload the files to somewhere with persistent storage.
COPR deletes the files after a couple of days and both your links are now 404.

Comment 3 Emanuele Petriglia 2026-07-23 13:05:11 UTC
Hi Artur, I have re-uploaded the files to Fedora People.

Spec URL: https://emape.fedorapeople.org/fx.spec
SRPM URL: https://emape.fedorapeople.org/fx-39.2.0-1.fc44.src.rpm

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-07-23 15:33:48 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10767824
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2497055-fx/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10767824-fx/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fx
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2026-07-24 22:09:51 UTC
> %doc README.md RELEASE.md npm/README.md

You can drop npm/README.md before importing.

Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm and Go Vendor Tools, which simplifies
the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [x] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [x] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.
- [-] GO_LDFLAGS are set correctly.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.