Bug 249707 - Add "courier" to mailgroup in mailman.spec
Summary: Add "courier" to mailgroup in mailman.spec
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mailman   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Tomas Smetana
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-07-26 15:44 UTC by Aleksander Adamowski
Modified: 2013-04-12 19:16 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-16 14:52:49 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch against mailman.spec (1.02 KB, patch)
2007-07-26 15:44 UTC, Aleksander Adamowski 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Aleksander Adamowski 2007-07-26 15:44:20 UTC 
Description of problem:

The redhat build configuration of mailman specifies a predefined list of groups
mail spoolers typically run as (mail, postfix, mailman, nobody, daemon). The
list doesn't contain the group "courier", which is typically used by Courier MTA
(http://www.courier-mta.org/).

Please, add courier to this list - I can see no harm in this and making Mailman
work with courier won't  require a rebuild of RPM.

Sample patch attached.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

2.1.9-2
Comment 1 Aleksander Adamowski 2007-07-26 15:44:20 UTC 
Created attachment 160031 [details]
Patch against mailman.spec
Comment 2 Tomas Smetana 2007-08-01 09:49:15 UTC 
I failed to find the Courier package in the RHEL package collection. I don't see
much reason in adding references to an usupported software to the spec file. If
someone installs Courier, he can reconfigure Mailman.
Comment 5 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-10-16 14:52:49 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.