Bug 249726 - Misspellings in RPM description, suggested clarifications
Summary: Misspellings in RPM description, suggested clarifications
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel-xen   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Don Zickus
QA Contact: Martin Jenner
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-07-26 17:49 UTC by Steve Bonneville
Modified: 2009-01-20 20:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 20:21:54 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2009:0225 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 kernel security and bug fix update 2009-01-20 16:06:24 UTC

Description Steve Bonneville 2007-07-26 17:49:01 UTC
Description of problem:

There are typos in the description of the kernel-xen RPM, and 
it could use clarification.

Currently READS:
This package includes a version of the Linux kernel which runs in Xen VM.  It
works for both priviledged and unpriviledged hosts.

This package includes a Xen hypervisor and a version of the Linux kernel which
can run Xen VMs for privileged hosts and unprivileged paravirtualized hosts.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Comment 1 Bill Burns 2008-04-30 14:08:14 UTC
Reassigning to the package maintainer.

Comment 2 Don Zickus 2008-04-30 14:34:11 UTC
Fair enough, I'll post this change for 5.3.

Out of curiosity, was this a customer request or something you noticed.  Just
wondering if I should go proof read the other descriptions too for proper English.

Comment 3 Steve Bonneville 2008-04-30 14:58:13 UTC
A customer and I discovered the description problem with the xen package
reported in bug #249719 during a training class, which led us to look at the
kernel-xen description, which led us to this bug.

If we can mess these up, my guess is that there are other descriptions that are
off; up to y'all to figure out how high a priority it is to do an editing
pass/bug hunt.  :)  I wonder if there's a way to run Summary and Description
through a spelling checker in a useful way when we QA?

Comment 4 Don Zickus 2008-04-30 15:17:03 UTC
hmm.  Spell checking is an interesting idea for rpmdiff maybe.  But I am all for
improving the text if it helps people understand the packages easier.

Sometimes it is the little things that makes Red Hat provide a better service. :-)

Comment 6 RHEL Product and Program Management 2008-06-09 22:01:27 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update

Comment 7 Don Zickus 2008-09-15 14:16:13 UTC
in kernel-2.6.18-115.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 20:21:54 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.