Bug 249933 – outdated version of ghostscript (8.15) still being used

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours

Bug 249933 - outdated version of ghostscript (8.15) still being used

Summary:	outdated version of ghostscript (8.15) still being used

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 239646

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	ghostscript (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tim Waugh
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-07-28 03:09 EDT by NILMONI DEB
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-07-30 05:18:30 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description NILMONI DEB 2007-07-28 03:09:07 EDT

Description of problem:

According to the ghostscript home page at http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/ 
ghostscript with GPL license were released at these dates.

GPL Ghostscript 8.56 released 2007-03-15
GPL Ghostscript 8.54 released 2006-06-01 
GPL Ghostscript 8.15 released 2004-09-23

Surely, fedora 7 could have come with 8.54 in the least (8.15 is now almost 3 
years old). 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghostscript-8.15.4-3.fc7

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2007-07-30 05:18:30 EDT

There's much more to it than just 'new version' -- 8.57 doesn't have CJK
support, most of the ESP branch merge is missing, lots of GNU drivers missing,
etc.  8.60 is what we're hoping to get into Fedora 8, if it is released in time.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239646 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.