Bug 2499989 - GRUB EFI for Confidential Computing
Summary: GRUB EFI for Confidential Computing
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Changes Tracking
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Leo Sandoval
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F45Changes
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-07-14 14:11 UTC by Aoife Moloney
Modified: 2026-09-15 16:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
fedora-admin-xmlrpc: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aoife Moloney 2026-07-14 14:11:27 UTC
This is a tracking bug for Change: GRUB EFI for Confidential Computing
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Grub2LightForConfidentialComputing

An independent separate incarnation (package) of the GRUB bootloader for UEFI only that contains a minimal number of built-in modules, and can quickly boot a Unified Kernel Image (UKI) using Bootloader Specification (BLS) files. It will be built separately from the main GRUB package, and does not replace it for general usage.

If you encounter a bug related to this Change, please do not comment here. Instead create a new bug and set it to block this bug.

Comment 1 Leo Sandoval 2026-08-11 00:13:05 UTC
Aoife,

Pardon if I created more work for you but I was following this guide 

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/#create_your_review_request 

then I created the following ' Review Request: grub2-confidential-computing - Grub image for use in confidential computing '

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2513599

which seems to be a duplicated of this one, I am not sure. 

Let me know if I am understanding the process or just complicating it a bit more.

Comment 2 Aoife Moloney 2026-08-31 10:06:51 UTC
Hi Leo, Is the bz you shared here the work for the change proposal?

Comment 3 Leo Sandoval 2026-08-31 15:42:08 UTC
(In reply to Aoife Moloney from comment #2)
> Hi Leo, Is the bz you shared here the work for the change proposal?

Hi Aoife, yes, the bz I posted is the new spec for the change proposal.

Comment 4 Maxwell G 2026-09-01 17:26:35 UTC
I would suggest sending a message to the devel list to request help with the package review or better yet, a "review swap." Otherwise, this Change may not land in time.

Comment 5 Leo Sandoval 2026-09-01 18:28:13 UTC
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #4)
> I would suggest sending a message to the devel list to request help with the
> package review or better yet, a "review swap." Otherwise, this Change may
> not land in time.

Thanks Maxwell, I have sent the 'review swap' email. Let's see if I can get some help.

Comment 6 Maxwell G 2026-09-14 21:02:34 UTC
Hi, are you planning to import and build the package for f45?

Comment 7 Leo Sandoval 2026-09-15 16:58:50 UTC
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #6)
> Hi, are you planning to import and build the package for f45?

Yes, that is the plan. Review went well [1] so import & build are the next steps and I plan to do it ASAP.

Comment 8 Leo Sandoval 2026-09-15 16:59:59 UTC
(In reply to Leo Sandoval from comment #7)
> (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #6)
> > Hi, are you planning to import and build the package for f45?
> 
> Yes, that is the plan. Review went well [1] so import & build are the next
> steps and I plan to do it ASAP.

Click too fast, link of [1]

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2513599


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.