Description of problem: From issue-tracker: On my SandDune (Superdome/sx2000), I have a _lot_ of disks, a lot of networking cards, and a lot of various Linux installs. I have 10 bootable entries, as follows: [root@worm0 ~]# efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0008 Timeout: 10 seconds BootOrder: 0000,0005,0004,0008,0009,0003,0001,0007,0002,0006 Boot0000* EFI Shell Boot0001* Gbit Boot NIC Boot0002* USB Optical/DVD drive Boot0003* 10GigE NIC Boot Boot0004* RHEL5 Server Boot0005* RHEL4u4 AS Boot0006* SCSI Optical/DVD Drive Boot0007* Smart Setup from USB/HDD Boot0008* RHEL4.5 AS (snap#5) Boot0009* SLES10 [root@worm0 ~]# Now the problem is that if I install a NEW copy of RHEL4.5 (snapshot 5), the installer creates an entry named "Boot000a" (with a lower-case 'A'). If you boot to RHEL5 and run "efibootmgr", it complains about the lower-case 'A' and suggests the user fix that by changing the boot entry via EFI. The problem with this: EFI doesn't recognize it. So, RHEL4.5 needs to ensure that Hex-digits a-f are UPPER-CASE when it creates boot entries. It appears this was fixed upstream and is already fixed in RHEL5. I will provide a patch. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Created attachment 160355 [details] patch taken directly from upstream efibootmgr
Exception request will be filed ASAP.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0664.html