Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/rust-tcp-stream.spec SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/rust-tcp-stream-0.34.14-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: Wraps std::net::TcpStream in a TcpStream enum that can be upgraded to a TLS-encrypted stream via TcpStream::into_tls. Supported backends are rustls (default), native-tls, and OpenSSL. Async futures-io trait implementations are provided when the futures feature is enabled. Fedora Account System Username: jcline This is part of my effort to package lapin, which I need for fedora-siguldry-autopen. Specfile is generated with rust2rpm with the following config: [features] hide = [ "rustls", "rustls--aws_lc_rs", "rustls--ring", "rustls-futures", "rustls-native-certs", "rustls-platform-verifier", "rustls-webpki-roots-certs", "vendored-openssl", ] [tests] run = ["lib"] comments = [ "The doctests send requests to external hosts (www.rust-lang.org)" ]
rust-async-openssl and rust-async-native-tls aren't available packages in Fedora Rawhide and are required by this package, are there reviews open for these as well? Other than that, the actual content of the spec looks great -- only suggestion would be adding a commented link to the PR or commit your patch is from.
Okay, I missed this since they're from non-default features. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2508398 is for rust-async-openssl which is the one I am interested about. async-native-tls is packaged, but outdated in Fedora. I'm inclined to just hide the native-tls feature since I don't care about it.
Looks great! Only nitpick is: %doc %{crate_instdir}/AGENTS.md Could drop the %doc since this is just an off-the-shelf CLAUDE.md Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/cargo/registry/async- openssl-0.2.8/AGENTS.md See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "MIT License". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/kylegospo/2508398-rust-async- openssl/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust- async-openssl-devel , rust-async-openssl+default-devel [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rust-async-openssl-devel-0.2.8-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-async-openssl+default-devel-0.2.8-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-async-openssl-0.2.8-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpuascbt_c')] checks: 32, packages: 3 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 13 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 9 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/async-openssl/0.2.8/download#/async-openssl-0.2.8.crate : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e40039e35a6d23298adf902448b8cc3a7b0ef77e5016e1f642367b332638b205 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e40039e35a6d23298adf902448b8cc3a7b0ef77e5016e1f642367b332638b205 Requires -------- rust-async-openssl-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(futures-io/default) >= 0.3.0 with crate(futures-io/default) < 0.4.0~) (crate(openssl-sys/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(openssl-sys/default) < 0.10.0~) (crate(openssl/default) >= 0.10.72 with crate(openssl/default) < 0.11.0~) cargo rust rust-async-openssl+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(async-openssl) Provides -------- rust-async-openssl-devel: crate(async-openssl) purl(pkg:cargo/async-openssl.8) rust-async-openssl-devel rust-async-openssl+default-devel: crate(async-openssl/default) rust-async-openssl+default-devel Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/kylegospo/2508398-rust-async-openssl/srpm/rust-async-openssl.spec 2026-07-29 15:47:46.116300615 -0700 +++ /home/kylegospo/2508398-rust-async-openssl/srpm-unpacked/rust-async-openssl.spec 2026-07-28 17:00:00.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.8.4) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + # Generated by rust2rpm 28 %bcond check 1 @@ -69,3 +79,6 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Wed Jul 29 2026 John Doe <packager> - 0.2.8-1 +- Uncommitted changes +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2508398 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: R, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, PHP, fonts, Perl, Ocaml, Java, Haskell Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
Disregard above comment about doc, that applies to your other package required by this one. Rest of the review is valid.
Updated spec and SRPM Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/rust-tcp-stream.spec SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/rust-tcp-stream-0.34.14-1.fc45.src.rpm - Hid the native-tls feature flags as I don't use them in the application I'm packaging this for. The native-tls package is in Fedora, but outdated so if someone does end caring they can do the busy-work to bring in the new version. - rust-async-openssl is now in Rawhide (thanks!)
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10799062 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2508039-rust-tcp-stream/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10799062-rust-tcp-stream/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Looks great, +1 Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-Clause License". 21 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/rust-tcp-stream/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust- tcp-stream-devel , rust-tcp-stream+default-devel , rust-tcp- stream+async-global-executor-devel , rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel , rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel , rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel , rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel , rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [-]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rust-tcp-stream-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+default-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel-0.34.14-1.fc45.noarch.rpm rust-tcp-stream-0.34.14-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpegm8ki8i')] checks: 32, packages: 9 rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+default-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream.src: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream.src: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', 'Summary(en_US) TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') rust-tcp-stream-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('TcpStream', '%description -l en_US TcpStream -> Upstream, Stream') 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 0 warnings, 49 filtered, 18 badness; has taken 0.8 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+default-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 8 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/tcp-stream/0.34.14/download#/tcp-stream-0.34.14.crate : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 300d0735de48a565461c2ea14cc75b80ee5b6be3b4f5aeabe3553e4c2df8d23d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 300d0735de48a565461c2ea14cc75b80ee5b6be3b4f5aeabe3553e4c2df8d23d Requires -------- rust-tcp-stream-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(cfg-if/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(cfg-if/default) < 2.0.0~) cargo rust rust-tcp-stream+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(tcp-stream) crate(tcp-stream/openssl) crate(tcp-stream/tokio) rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(async-rs) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs) < 0.9.0~) (crate(async-rs/async-global-executor) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs/async-global-executor) < 0.9.0~) (crate(async-rs/async-io) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs/async-io) < 0.9.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) crate(tcp-stream/futures) rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(async-rs) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs) < 0.9.0~) (crate(futures-io/default) >= 0.3.0 with crate(futures-io/default) < 0.4.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(openssl/default) >= 0.10.72 with crate(openssl/default) < 0.11.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(async-openssl/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(async-openssl/default) < 0.3.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) crate(tcp-stream/futures) crate(tcp-stream/openssl) rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(async-rs) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs) < 0.9.0~) (crate(async-rs/smol) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs/smol) < 0.9.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) crate(tcp-stream/futures) rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(async-rs) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs) < 0.9.0~) (crate(async-rs/tokio) >= 0.8.0 with crate(async-rs/tokio) < 0.9.0~) cargo crate(tcp-stream) crate(tcp-stream/futures) Provides -------- rust-tcp-stream-devel: crate(tcp-stream) purl(pkg:cargo/tcp-stream.14) rust-tcp-stream-devel rust-tcp-stream+default-devel: crate(tcp-stream/default) rust-tcp-stream+default-devel rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel: crate(tcp-stream/async-global-executor) rust-tcp-stream+async-global-executor-devel rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel: crate(tcp-stream/futures) rust-tcp-stream+futures-devel rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel: crate(tcp-stream/openssl) rust-tcp-stream+openssl-devel rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel: crate(tcp-stream/openssl-futures) rust-tcp-stream+openssl-futures-devel rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel: crate(tcp-stream/smol) rust-tcp-stream+smol-devel rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel: crate(tcp-stream/tokio) rust-tcp-stream+tokio-devel Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name rust-tcp-stream --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: Java, fonts, R, Ocaml, PHP, Python, C/C++, SugarActivity, Haskell, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tcp-stream Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`