Bug 250839 – Please rebuild lzop for EPEL 4 and 5

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 250839 - Please rebuild lzop for EPEL 4 and 5

Summary:	Please rebuild lzop for EPEL 4 and 5

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	lzop (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nicolas Mailhot
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	249079
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-08-03 17:06 EDT by Robert Scheck
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-08-11 19:17:29 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Flags:	kevin: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 17:06:58 EDT

Description of problem:
Please rebuild lzop for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lzop-1.02-0.4.rc1.fc6.src.rpm

Actual results:
No lzop in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package lzop in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency.

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
there.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 17:11:22 EDT

Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too:

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/lzop-1.02-0.4.rc1.el5.i386.rpm
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/lzop-debuginfo-1.02-0.4.rc1.el5.i386.rpm

Comment 2 Nicolas Mailhot 2007-08-11 07:45:14 EDT

Hi Robert,

I don't do EPEL. The package is open for EPEL branching should a Fedora
contributor be interested

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2007-08-11 07:55:41 EDT

Nicolas, would it be okay, if I get maintainer for EPEL branches and just a
co-maintainer for the Fedora branches (or devel)?

Comment 4 Nicolas Mailhot 2007-08-11 08:15:50 EDT

That's ok and how Net::Server is already managed. Same for all my packages. I
don't want to care about EPEL so specific EPEL maintainers are needed

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2007-08-11 13:01:04 EDT

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: lzop
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated Fedora Owners: CURRENT MAINTAINERS + robert
Updated EPEL Owners: robert

As I only did a few change requests in the past, here is what I would like to 
do: Request EPEL branches with me as owner and adding myself as co-maintainer 
for the Fedora branches.

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2007-08-11 17:48:57 EDT

cvs done.

Comment 7 Robert Scheck 2007-08-11 19:17:29 EDT

Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded.
Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.