Bug 250869 - Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5
Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-Razor-Agent
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Warren Togami
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: 249079
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-08-03 22:27 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-08-11 16:31:29 UTC
Type: ---
wtogami: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 22:27:21 UTC
Description of problem:
Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Actual results:
No perl-Razor-Agent in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package perl-Razor-Agent in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new 

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too:

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Razor-Agent-2.82-1.el5.i386.rpm
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Razor-Agent-debuginfo-2.82-1.el5.i386.rpm

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2007-08-06 16:07:17 UTC
I personally don't use perl-Razor-Agent anymore.  Would you like to take over
ownership in Fedora and EPEL?

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2007-08-07 19:38:32 UTC
Thanks Warren, yes I would like to take it over hereby:

Package Change Request
Package Name: perl-Razor-Agent
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated Fedora Owners: redhat-bugzilla

Please agree. I didn't add any EPEL owners line as there is no EPEL branch, 
yet. Is this correct?

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2007-08-11 16:31:29 UTC
I bumped perl-Razor-Agent to 2.84 and tested - results below:

Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete
Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete
Build on target fedora-6-extras succeeded.
Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded.
Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.