Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bash-color-prompt/bash-color-prompt.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bash-color-prompt/bash-color-prompt-0.95.3-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: A flexible customizable Bash prompt framework. Fedora Account System Username: petersen Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148966210
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10845986 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2513913-bash-color-prompt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10845986-bash-color-prompt/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
This is part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BashColorPrompt_1.0 There is also a copr repo for Fedora and EPEL 10 releases: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/bash-color-prompt/
Also this is mostly just a rename of the shell-color-prompt source package. Though it does contain a major version bump for the Change. As such the package review itself should be pretty straightforward, since the binary package name is unchanged.
I can also emphasize here that the default prompt remains pixel identical to the current version.
Sorry Benson, I asked Mike to help with the review because of the urgency as I will be away next week and the freeze starts on Tue.
It looks OK to me and I tested it a bit and found no issues. the spec file looks fine to me.
Thank you for the review, Mike
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bash-color-prompt Monitoring: Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issues/321 f45
I missed to declare here AI usage on this code base (I wasn't fully aware of this requirement at the time when I submitted this package or until after it was approved). The initial code was generated by Gemini Pro earlier this year in chat conversations which I reviewed carefully and improved upon. The recent change to the improved Builder Pattern approach was also AI assisted. I am reasonably confident that the code is of a decent quality, though suggestions for further improvement are welcome.