Bug 2516517 (CVE-2026-72094) - CVE-2026-72094 kernel: dma-buf: dma-fence: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
Summary: CVE-2026-72094 kernel: dma-buf: dma-fence: Fix potential NULL pointer derefer...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-72094
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-15 06:16 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-08-17 21:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-15 06:16:38 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dma-buf: dma-fence: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference

The commit mentioned in the fixes tag below introduced a mechanism
through which fence producers can fully decouple from fence consumers.
This, desirable, mechanism is based on the fence's signaled-bit as the
"decoupling point".

A sophisticated interaction between RCU and atomic instructions attempts
to ensure that fence consumers can still interact with fence producers
through the dma_fence_ops (callback pointers into the producer).

This is the desired behavior: to check for decoupling, the signaled-bit
is first checked. If it's not yet signaled, RCU ensures that the ops
pointer cannot yet be NULL.

Hereby, dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked() first sets the signaled-bit,
and then sets the ops pointer to NULL. Readers first load the ops
pointer, and then check through the signaled-bit whether the pointer can
legally be accessed.

These set and load operations could occur out of order on weakly ordered
platforms. This problem can be solved very elegantly by using the ops
pointer itself as the synchronization point. The pointer is either NULL,
or cannot become NULL while it is being used thanks to RCU.

Replace the signaled-bit check in dma_fence_timeline_name() and
dma_fence_driver_name().


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.