Bug 2516572 (CVE-2026-72166) - CVE-2026-72166 kernel: net/9p: fix infinite loop in p9_client_rpc on fatal signal
Summary: CVE-2026-72166 kernel: net/9p: fix infinite loop in p9_client_rpc on fatal si...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-72166
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-15 06:19 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-08-18 13:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-15 06:19:40 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/9p: fix infinite loop in p9_client_rpc on fatal signal

When p9_client_rpc() is called with type P9_TFLUSH and the transport
has no peer (e.g. fd transport backed by pipes with no 9p server),
a fatal signal causes an infinite loop:

  again:
	err = io_wait_event_killable(req->wq, ...)
	/* SIGKILL wakes the task, returns -ERESTARTSYS */

	if (err == -ERESTARTSYS && c->status == Connected &&
		type == P9_TFLUSH) {
		sigpending = 1;
		clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
		goto again;
	}

clear_thread_flag() clears TIF_SIGPENDING before jumping back to
io_wait_event_killable(). signal_pending_state() checks TIF_SIGPENDING,
finds it zero, and the task goes to sleep again. The task can only wake
on the next signal delivery that calls signal_wake_up() and sets
TIF_SIGPENDING again. When that happens the loop repeats, clears
TIF_SIGPENDING, and sleeps again indefinitely.

This is triggered in practice by coredump_wait(): when a thread in a
multi-threaded process causes a coredump (e.g. via SIGSYS from Syscall
User Dispatch), coredump_wait() sends SIGKILL to all other threads and
waits for them to call mm_release(). If one of those threads is blocked
in p9_client_rpc() over an fd transport with no peer, it enters the
P9_TFLUSH loop and never calls mm_release(), so coredump_wait() stalls
forever:

INFO: task syz.0.18:676 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
      Not tainted 6.12.77+ #1
task:syz.0.18 state:D stack:27600 pid:676 tgid:673 ppid:630 flags:0x00000004
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5344 [inline]
 __schedule+0xcb4/0x5d50 kernel/sched/core.c:6724
 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6801 [inline]
 schedule+0xe5/0x350 kernel/sched/core.c:6816
 schedule_timeout+0x253/0x290 kernel/time/timer.c:2593
 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:95 [inline]
 __wait_for_common+0x409/0x600 kernel/sched/completion.c:116
 wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:127 [inline]
 wait_for_completion_state+0x1d/0x40 kernel/sched/completion.c:264
 coredump_wait fs/coredump.c:448 [inline]
 do_coredump+0x854/0x4350 fs/coredump.c:629
 get_signal+0x1425/0x2730 kernel/signal.c:2903
 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x81/0x880 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337
 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xf9/0x160 kernel/entry/common.c:218
 do_syscall_64+0x102/0x220 arch/x86/entry/common.c:84
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
 </TASK>

Fix: check fatal_signal_pending() before clearing TIF_SIGPENDING in the
P9_TFLUSH retry loop. At that point TIF_SIGPENDING is still set, so
fatal_signal_pending() works correctly. If a fatal signal is pending,
jump to recalc_sigpending to restore TIF_SIGPENDING and return
-ERESTARTSYS to the caller.

The same defect is present in stable kernels back to 5.4. On those
kernels the infinite loop is broken earlier by a second SIGKILL from
the parent process (e.g. kill_and_wait() retrying after a timeout),
resulting in a zombie process and a shutdown delay rather than a
permanent D-state hang, but the underlying flaw is the same.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.