Bug 2516899 (CVE-2026-74350) - CVE-2026-74350 kernel: ocfs2: validate fast symlink target during inode read
Summary: CVE-2026-74350 kernel: ocfs2: validate fast symlink target during inode read
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-74350
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-15 06:39 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-08-20 18:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-15 06:39:18 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: validate fast symlink target during inode read

ocfs2_validate_inode_block() already rejects several inconsistent
self-contained dinodes before they are exposed to the rest of the
filesystem.  Fast symlinks need the same treatment.

A zero-cluster symlink is treated as a fast symlink and later read through
page_get_link() and ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio().  That path uses
strnlen() on the inline payload and then copies len + 1 bytes into the
folio.  If a corrupt dinode stores an i_size that does not fit the inline
area or omits the terminating NUL at i_size, that copy reads past the end
of the inode block buffer.

Reject zero-cluster symlink dinodes whose i_size exceeds the inline
fast-symlink capacity or whose inline payload is not NUL-terminated
exactly at i_size when the inode block is validated.  This keeps malformed
fast symlinks from reaching the read path.

Validation reproduced this kernel report:
KASAN use-after-free in ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio+0x12c/0x1f0
RIP: 0033:0x7f5c6d859aa7
Read of size 3905
Call trace:
  dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0 (?:?)
  print_report+0xce/0x630 (?:?)
  ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio+0x12c/0x1f0 (fs/ocfs2/inode.c:?)
  srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 (?:?)
  __virt_addr_valid+0x19f/0x330 (?:?)
  kasan_report+0xe0/0x110 (?:?)
  kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 (?:?)
  __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 (?:?)
  filemap_read_folio+0x27/0xe0 (?:?)
  filemap_read_folio+0x35/0xe0 (?:?)
  do_read_cache_folio+0x138/0x230 (?:?)
  __page_get_link+0x26/0x110 (?:?)
  page_get_link+0x2e/0x70 (?:?)
  vfs_readlink+0x15e/0x250 (?:?)
  touch_atime+0x4d/0x370 (?:?)
  do_readlinkat+0x186/0x200 (?:?)
  do_user_addr_fault+0x65a/0x890 (?:?)
  __x64_sys_readlink+0x46/0x60 (?:?)
  do_syscall_64+0x115/0x6a0 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:87)
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f (?:?)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.