Bug 2517562 (CVE-2026-14457) - CVE-2026-14457 openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate
Summary: CVE-2026-14457 openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can derefere...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-14457
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2523632 2523633 2523634 2523635 2523636 2523637
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-17 19:37 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-08-27 07:36 UTC (History)
48 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-17 19:37:47 UTC
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.

The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.

While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).

When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.

Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.

No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1, and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.2.
OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.4.
OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.8.
OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.7.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.