Bug 2517607 - Review Request: oo7 - Secret Service provider
Summary: Review Request: oo7 - Secret Service provider
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/linux-credentials/oo7
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-17 20:49 UTC by Fabio Valentini
Modified: 2026-08-18 23:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: oo7-0.7.0~alpha-1.fc46
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-08-18 23:21:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabio Valentini 2026-08-17 20:49:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/oo7.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/oo7-0.7.0~alpha-1.fc44.src.rpm
Upstream URL: https://github.com/linux-credentials/oo7

Description:
Secret Service provider.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2026-08-17 20:49:25 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149224000

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2026-08-17 20:52:42 UTC
Note: One thing I was not sure about was the inter-dependencies between the packages.

The only "hard" dependencies seem to be pam_oo7 -> oo7-daemon (and possibly oo7-portal -> oo7-daemon).

It looks like the other components communicate over the Secret Service DBus API and for that it doesn't really matter which thing is on the other end, as far as I can tell, so I didn't add hard dependencies from oo7-cli and the git and cargo credential helpers to oo7-daemon.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2026-08-17 20:57:15 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2026-08-17 21:00:48 UTC
Initial spec review:

> %build
> # oo7-daemon
> pushd server
> %meson
> %meson_build
> popd
>
> # oo7-pam
> pushd pam
> %meson
> %meson_build
> popd
>
> # oo7-portal
> pushd portal
> %meson
> %meson_build
> popd

Can we please split this into %conf and %build phases? I know it's a bit much, but I think it's worth it to at least leverage the three phases properly.

Comment 5 Fabio Valentini 2026-08-17 21:05:59 UTC
Would that look like this?

```
%conf
# oo7-daemon
pushd server
%meson
popd

# oo7-pam
pushd pam
%meson
popd

# oo7-portal
pushd portal
%meson
popd

%build
# oo7-daemon
pushd server
%meson_build
popd

# oo7-pam
pushd pam
%meson_build
popd

# oo7-portal
pushd portal
%meson_build
popd
```

This ... feels unnecessarily verbose.

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2026-08-17 21:15:05 UTC
Yes, it would look like that.

(It boggles the mind why there isn't a top-level meson.build, but whatever...)

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2026-08-17 21:31:31 UTC
Alright, done. Files behind the same URLs have updated contents.

Comment 8 Neal Gompa 2026-08-17 21:37:42 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines
* Package follows Fedora Rust packaging guidelines
* Package licensing is correct and license files are installed correctly
* Package builds and installs
* No serious issues from rpmlint

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-08-18 22:02:15 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oo7
Monitoring:
Anitya project is accessible by this link 
`https://release-monitoring.org/project/375085`
 you can modify it manually.
Package wasn't created in Anitya, reason: `Bad Request, some necessary arguments were not provided.`.

Comment 10 Fabio Valentini 2026-08-18 23:21:22 UTC
Thank you for the review.
Package imported and built:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-bfecfe5c45
(F45 build still running.)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.