Bug 252082 - Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 532523
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Colin Walters
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-08-13 17:46 EDT by Vivek Lakshmanan
Modified: 2009-11-02 15:26 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-09-03 13:34:54 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 17:46:58 EDT
Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jarjar.spec
SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jarjar-0.6-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm

Jar Jar Links is a utility that makes it easy to repackage Java
libraries and embed them into your own distribution. This is
useful for two reasons:
You can easily ship a single jar file with no external dependencies.
You can avoid problems where your library depends on a specific
version of a library, which may conflict with the dependencies of
another library.
Needed for supporting application servers
Comment 1 Colin Walters 2008-04-02 20:53:52 EDT
Taking this.

+ Builds OK in mock
* I'd change the %description for the javadoc and manual to be a little bit
better; just "Javadoc for %{name}" and "Manual for %{name} is fine.
* Can we rm -f the shipped jar files instead of just moving them?
* Do we really need the %pre/%post for the javadoc?  I don't see that in the
current Java guidelines.
Comment 2 Rakesh Pandit 2008-09-03 12:42:15 EDT
@Vivek & @Colin

Are you folks still interested in continuing this ticket?
This will be closed with in a week - if no update ?
Comment 3 Vivek Lakshmanan 2008-09-03 13:25:21 EDT
I am not interested in maintaining this package anymore. Please consider this particular review request withdrawn.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:26:00 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 532523 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.