Bug 252086 – Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 252086 - Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects

Summary:	Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 227072

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://jmock.codehaus.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-08-13 17:50 EDT by Vivek Lakshmanan
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-08-13 20:00:07 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 17:50:38 EDT

Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jmock.spec
SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jmock-1.0.1-3jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm

jMock is a library for testing Java code using mock objects.
Mock objects help you design and test the interactions between the
objects in your programs.
The jMock package:
* makes it quick and easy to define mock objects, so you don't break
the rhythm of programming.
* lets you define flexible constraints over object interactions,
reducing the brittleness of your tests.
* is easy to extend.
Needed for supporting application servers

Comment 1 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 20:00:07 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227072 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.