Bug 2521661 - Review Request: txnupd-maintenance-tools - Maintenance tools for transactional systems
Summary: Review Request: txnupd-maintenance-tools - Maintenance tools for transactiona...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://codeberg.org/KalpaDesktop/txn...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-23 18:53 UTC by Shawn W Dunn
Modified: 2026-08-29 18:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shawn W Dunn 2026-08-23 18:53:29 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sfaulken/transactional/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10895290-txnupd-maintenance-tools/txnupd-maintenance-tools.spec

SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sfaulken/transactional/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10895290-txnupd-maintenance-tools/txnupd-maintenance-tools-1.1.beta-1.fc46.src.rpm

Description: Tools for maintenance of Transactional systems, including a D-Bus client/daemon for update notifications, provides a number of functions that didn't make sense to include in the dnf5-txnupd plugin.

FAS Username: sfaulken

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2026-08-23 19:51:47 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2026-08-24 13:56:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10897336
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2521661-txnupd-maintenance-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10897336-txnupd-maintenance-tools/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Systemd user unit service file(s) in txnupd-maintenance-tools
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_user_units

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2026-08-26 13:42:09 UTC
Initial spec review:

> Version:        1.1.beta

This needs to be formulated "1.1~beta" otherwise 1.1 will sort lower than the betas.

You might want your own custom version of the %version_no_tilde macro that handles your scheme for filenames and whatnot.

> %autosetup -p1

Unless you plan to support EPEL 9 or older, this can be "%autosetup -C -p1", so that you don't have to deal with the name-version inconsistency once you fix Version.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.