gstreamer-plugins-good-devel.ppc64 is available in F7, but not gstreamer-plugins-good.ppc64. # yum -C --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-testing-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-testing search gstreamer-plugins-goo Loading "installonlyn" plugin gstreamer-plugins-good-devel.ppc 0.10.5-6.fc7 installed Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel gstreamer-plugins-good.ppc 0.10.5-6.fc7 fedora Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good gstreamer-plugins-good-devel.ppc64 0.10.5-6.fc7 fedora Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel gstreamer-plugins-good.ppc 0.10.5-6.fc7 installed Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good gstreamer-plugins-good-devel.ppc 0.10.5-6.fc7 fedora Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel gstreamer-plugins-good-devel.ppc64 0.10.5-6.fc7 installed Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel gstreamer-plugins-good-debuginfo.ppc 0.10.5-6.fc7 fedora-debuginfo Matched from: gstreamer-plugins-good-debuginfo Debug information for package gstreamer-plugins-good This package provides debug information for package gstreamer-plugins-good. Debug information is useful when developing applications that use this package or when debugging this package.
It doesn't seem to be in rawhide either: # yum -y --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-testing-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=development install gstreamer-plugins-good.ppc64 Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
The package was actually built though: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=13493
why would you want this? ppc64 packages on ppc are treated as the multilib packages, as such only specifically needed things are directly considered (kernel/glibc/etc..), then everything else is a result of the -devel package being considered for cross arch development, and the direct dependencies therein. Nothing that matches the above (simplified) criteria pulls in gstreamer-plugins-good as ppc64. Is this causing any real problem?
It's needed for totem, rhythmbox, and any gstreamer applications to run on PPC64. Otherwise, I might just excludearch ppc64 for those packages.
Note that there's a requires in Totem for this package. Should I have added the specific arch in the deps? $ grep plugins-good totem.spec Requires: gstreamer-plugins-good >= %gstreamer_plugins_good_version BuildRequires: gstreamer-plugins-good >= %gstreamer_plugins_good_version - Add gstreamer-plugins-good as a builddep so that gconfaudiosink
This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
We don't select gstreamer plugins to be multilib packages when composing a tree. Theoretically we should.
Will be fixed in 0.4.3-1.
mash-0.5.16-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.16-1.el5
mash-0.5.20-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.20-1.el5
mash-0.5.20-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.