What do you think about the following patch -- should we try and get this added
It looks good.
I understood from comment #39 in 222543 that this patch was included in your
latest images, which we're currently testing. Am I right ?
You are correct. The sooner you can provide feedback the better because I'd
like to get these updates included.
Do you see this patch as an absolute requirement for you (i.e. do they have
fixes that must be present for the cards to work well)? I know the checksum
offload didn't with the first patch, but if there is anything else you remember,
let us know.
IMHO, this patch should be included. The driver would use correct profiles for
both sysfs and interrupt handler routines. We're currently testing a kernel
image that includes thee bits.
I'll confirm the current state of testing after touching base with QA.
Can we depend on Chelsio for performing full regression testing on the updated
Jay, we can. They are currently regression testing my test kernels which
contain this patch.
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.