Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for Dave Love (FAS @loveshack, dave.love.uk), following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. I see they had activities on dist-git recent months (the last one is on rpms/opari2, Aug 12). However, the PR is opened early July and got no response from them so far. I also sent an email to dave.love.uk but didn't get reply. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain libxsmm.
I think this should be against the actual libxsmm package.
I've been on holiday -- it's that time of year in Europe -- and ill since them (still am). I've been attending to a few other packages as I've felt able but not that after starting work on an update, and it clearly wasn't stable initially. I can't find any such email now I've trawled work email. It wouldn't surprise me if it was junked by Proofpoint, or whatever it is. Do you want to maintain libxsmm, or what?
Dear Dave, Many thanks for your reply, and hope you recover soon! Yeah, maybe that email ended up in your spam folder :( I started the non-responsive maintainer procedure because the PR had been open since early July without a response, and I wasn't sure about the maintenance status of libxsmm. Since you've responded here, that concern is resolved. The reason why I was concerned about this is that we are currently working on re-integrating the CP2K and DBCSR packages in Fedora with the new libxs/libxsmm workflow. The libxs side is already fully prepared (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxs/), so once the libxsmm update is available in Fedora, we should be able to complete the downstream re-integration right away. On a related note, there's also some good news worth sharing: we've integrated Packit into the upstream repository (https://github.com/libxsmm/libxsmm/pull/1084), and Packit builds are now running for every PR and push, so I expect the update workflow to be easier going forward. That daid, I'd also be very happy to be involved with the Fedora libxsmm package if you'd like. Best, SY Wang
> That daid, ... It should be "that said". Sorry for typo.
Hi Dave, hope you are feeling better. Just a gentle ping if you could let @uwsy1059 or the scitech_sig share maintenance of libxsmm since cp2k is currently the only consumer of this. If you know other consumers do let us know.
I don't have time or energy to deal with this and stuff I wanted to check when I started on the update. I'll hand it over, but as far as I know it needs a FAS maintainer name for that, not email.
Hi Dave, My FAS username is "growl"(https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/growl), and here is scitech_sig group info (https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/scitech_sig). Best, SY
I'll transfer it shortly.
Many thinks for sharing maintenance! I've also added `scitech_sig` to members list.