Bug 2527912 - CVE-2026-82417 nextcloud: qs: Denial of Service via improper validation in stringify function [fedora-all]
Summary: CVE-2026-82417 nextcloud: qs: Denial of Service via improper validation in st...
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nextcloud
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Bauer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["5249b05d-adab-442e-b122-f...
Depends On:
Blocks: CVE-2026-82417
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-09-03 10:16 UTC by jkelly
Modified: 2026-09-20 02:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jkelly 2026-09-03 10:16:36 UTC
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.

### Summary



`qs.stringify` throws a `TypeError` when it serializes an object whose own `constructor` property has a truthy, non-callable `isBuffer` member. `utils.isBuffer` duck-types buffers by calling `obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj)` after checking only that the property is truthy, so a value such as `{ constructor: { isBuffer: "x" } }` makes the call throw `TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function`.



### Details



`lib/stringify.js:127` calls `utils.isBuffer` on every non-primitive value it serializes. `utils.isBuffer` (`lib/utils.js:332`) reads `obj.constructor.isBuffer` and invokes it without verifying that it is a function. `constructor` and `isBuffer` are ordinary property names, so any object carrying them as own properties reaches the unchecked call.



Such an object can be built from untrusted input. `qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true })` or `{ allowPrototypes: true }` keeps the `constructor` key as an own property (the default parse options drop it), and `JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}")` produces the same shape with no qs option involved. Express 4 with its default `query parser` setting and body-parser with `extended: true` both call `qs.parse` with `allowPrototypes: true`, so on those stacks `req.query` and `req.body` can carry the shape directly.



#### PoC



```js



var qs = require("qs");



qs.stringify(qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true }));



qs.stringify(JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}"));



// TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function



//     at Object.isBuffer (lib/utils.js:332:78)



//     at stringify (lib/stringify.js:127:45)



```



#### Fix



`lib/utils.js`, applied in e83d321 on `main` and released as v6.16.0:



```diff



- return !!(obj.constructor && obj.constructor.isBuffer && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));



+ return !!(obj.constructor && typeof obj.constructor.isBuffer === "function" && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));



```



Real `Buffer`, `safer-buffer`, and browserify `buffer` polyfill instances serialize exactly as before; only the throw is removed.



### Affected versions



`>=2.2.5 <6.16.0`, fixed in v6.16.0.



The unguarded duck-type was introduced in 3768a75 and first shipped in v2.2.5 (September 2014). v2.2.4 and earlier used `Buffer.isBuffer` and are not affected. Every release from v2.2.5 through v6.15.3 contains the unguarded call.



### Impact



An unauthenticated request can make any code path that re-serializes attacker-influenced data with `qs.stringify` (for example, rebuilding a query string from `req.query` for a redirect or an upstream request, or serializing a parsed JSON body) throw synchronously. In a typical Node.js HTTP framework the throw is caught by the framework error boundary and the affected request returns a 500; the process survives and other requests are unaffected. Where the call runs outside an error boundary, such as an `async` Express 4 handler (where the throw becomes an unhandled promise rejection) or a background job, the process exits, so the impact in that case depends on the application error handling rather than on qs.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2026-09-19 20:08:49 UTC
FEDORA-2026-5c1bbb46c3 (nextcloud-34.0.4-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-5c1bbb46c3

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2026-09-19 20:09:20 UTC
FEDORA-2026-362f1943c8 (nextcloud-34.0.4-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-362f1943c8

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2026-09-19 20:10:19 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c495e95154 (nextcloud-34.0.4-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c495e95154

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2026-09-19 20:10:59 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-9f20c01514 (nextcloud-34.0.4-1.el10_4) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.4.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-9f20c01514

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2026-09-19 20:19:09 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-31615b47ef (nextcloud-34.0.4-1.el10_3) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.3.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-31615b47ef

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 01:41:54 UTC
FEDORA-2026-c495e95154 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-c495e95154`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-c495e95154

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 01:47:49 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-9f20c01514 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.4 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-9f20c01514

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 02:02:03 UTC
FEDORA-2026-362f1943c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-362f1943c8`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-362f1943c8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 02:02:45 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d1bff6d983 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d1bff6d983

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 02:07:58 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-31615b47ef has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.3 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-31615b47ef

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-09-20 02:24:45 UTC
FEDORA-2026-5c1bbb46c3 has been pushed to the Fedora 45 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-5c1bbb46c3`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-5c1bbb46c3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.