Hide Forgot
Description of problem: hal fails to start Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): f8t1 How reproducible: seemingly easily (tried 2-3 times) Steps to Reproduce: 1. qemu -boot d -m 384 -cdrom Fedora-8-Test-1-Live-i686.iso -net none 2. 3. Actual results: hal fails to start Expected results: haldaemon should succeed to start Additional info: will attach qemu screenshot of hal --deamon=no --verbose=yes
Created attachment 161817 [details] qemu screencap of hal failure ignore the Clocksource quirk from qemu. will post a 2nd screen cap from shft-pgup
Created attachment 161818 [details] more qemu screencap - shft-pgup-d some more data from the hal --daemon=no --verbose=yes
so the nearly obvious thing of mv /var/cache/hald/fdi-cache~ /var/cache/hald/fdi-cache service haldaemon start seems to work. I've also noticed this problem on a livecd spun with f7+updates question #1) does the above really solve the problem, or is it possibly introducing bad side-effects question #2) what is the 'right' fix for this question #3) what is the best immediate workaround fix for this while waiting for a #2 to percolate down from upstream?
Hal starts, since I downloaded a new version. The shell command rpm -qa | grep hal gives the following result: hal-0.5.10-0.git20070831.fc8 hal-info-20070725-1.fc8 hal-cups-utils-0.6.12-3.fc8 hal-libs-0.5.10-0.git20070831.fc8 So, the status for me now is Worksforme.
Peter- This was on a livecd? And you confirmed the same issue prior to downloading the new version. I'll give it a shot when I get the f8t2 livecd.
No, this was on a clean install of f8t1, because I was unable to upgrade f7. I don't remember seeing the issue prior to f8t1, but I never notices if Hal was present or not.
Starts and runs OK in fc8t2. I presume it will also work for you, Jane.
nope, still broke. same exact thing with f8t2-i686 livecd under qemu with the following command line qemu -net none -boot d -m 384 -no-kqemu -cdrom Fedora-7.91-Live-i686.iso Can someone else try out that command line and confirm or contradict the bug?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.