Bug 2537395 (CVE-2026-94184) - CVE-2026-94184 fetchmail: fetchmail: stack-based buffer overflow in NTLM authentication (fetchmail-SA-2026-01)
Summary: CVE-2026-94184 fetchmail: fetchmail: stack-based buffer overflow in NTLM auth...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-94184
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-09-21 13:46 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-11-11 11:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:85959 0 None None None 2026-10-20 17:07:14 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:86981 0 None None None 2026-10-21 13:56:50 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:86982 0 None None None 2026-10-21 13:39:49 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:98480 0 None None None 2026-11-11 11:59:23 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:98583 0 None None None 2026-11-11 11:23:56 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-09-21 13:46:58 UTC
A flaw was found in fetchmail. A stack-based buffer overflow exists in the NTLM client authentication code (ntlm_helper() / buildSmbNtlmAuthResponse() in smbutil.c) when fetchmail is built with --enable-NTLM. The AddBytes macro copies data from a server-supplied NTLM Type 2 challenge into a fixed 1024-byte stack buffer without validating remaining capacity. A malicious or compromised mail server that advertises NTLM can overwrite a few dozen bytes past the buffer. Depending on compiler stack-frame layout, this may allow remote code execution; otherwise the practical impact is authentication failure or process abort under stack hardening. Affects fetchmail 5.0.8 through 6.6.6. Fixed in 6.6.7 (commit cb5be5c38471eec19e519ace0bc569176317ea92). Red Hat Enterprise Linux builds enable NTLM and ship affected versions.

Comment 1 Jon Orris 2026-10-20 17:07:13 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:85959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:85959

Comment 2 Jon Orris 2026-10-21 13:39:48 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:86982 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:86982

Comment 3 Jon Orris 2026-10-21 13:56:49 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:86981 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:86981

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2026-11-11 11:23:54 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:98583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:98583

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2026-11-11 11:59:22 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:98480 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:98480


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.