Bug 2559632 (CVE-2026-98953) - CVE-2026-98953 kernel: devlink: fix devlink_rel reference leak when notify work is pending
Summary: CVE-2026-98953 kernel: devlink: fix devlink_rel reference leak when notify wo...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-98953
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-10-23 12:47 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-10-27 13:40 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-10-23 12:47:00 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

devlink: fix devlink_rel reference leak when notify work is pending

devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work_schedule() takes a reference on the
devlink_rel for the notify work and then queues the work, ignoring the
return value of schedule_delayed_work(). If the work is already pending,
nothing new is queued, the work runs only once and drops only one
reference, so the extra one is leaked together with the devlink_rel and
its index in devlink_rels.

This is easy to hit. devl_register() of a nested instance queues the
work, and if the instance is unregistered before the work has run,
devlink_rel_put() queues it again while it is still pending. The work
also keeps rescheduling itself for as long as the parent devlink lock
cannot be taken, which widens the window. Registering and unregistering
a nested devlink instance 100 times while holding the parent lock leaks
all 100 devlink_rel objects.

The reschedule path in devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work() has the same
problem: if the work was queued again while it was running, the
reference it holds is never dropped.

Drop the reference in both places when the work was already pending.
The pending work holds its own reference, so this can not be the last
one.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.