Bug 275511 - Is __find_requires really required?
Summary: Is __find_requires really required?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xinetd
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Safranek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-09-03 19:17 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: xinetd-2.3.14-14.fc8
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-18 12:12:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2007-09-03 19:17:09 UTC 
Description of problem:
Is __find_requires really required? As far as I can see, it strips just a 
python dependency, but isn't python in each Fedora system anyway?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xinetd-2.3.14-13

Expected results:
Remove __find_requires, python should be there in any case and nevertheless 
there is something shipped, that requires python...
Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2007-09-06 08:56:12 UTC 
I'd rather remove the inetdconvert script and whole dependency (hidden or
visible) is gone. Who would update FC2 to F8 or newer?.
Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2007-09-06 09:03:49 UTC 
I do not want to release new version just with this simple change, it will be in
next xinetd update.
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2007-09-06 15:01:47 UTC 
Feel free to drop the inetdconvert script. It's okay for me if you wait for 
other changes as long as this change gets into F8 final.
Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2007-09-18 12:12:17 UTC 
Freeze for F8 test 3 is near and no other bug is pending, so let's release it
now... Look for xinetd-2.3.14-14.fc8.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.