Bug 281891 - Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam
Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from yo...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 281901
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 248314 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-09-07 01:13 EDT by Rahul Sundaram
Modified: 2013-03-13 01:42 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-07 08:19:57 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 01:13:09 EDT
Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese-0.2.4-1.src.rpm
Description: 

cheese is a cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web 
cam. It also provides some graphical effects in order to please the 
users play instinct
Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 01:19:22 EDT
Note that a earlier view of this program was submitted for review and closed
after a time period of non-response at #248314. This spec file is based on that
but updated to meet the new licensing guidelines and earlier review. Thanks to
Parag for the pre-review comments. 
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 02:07:35 EDT
*** Bug 248314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 02:14:56 EDT
Urgh, I did the very same thing today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901

My packaging was done independently; maybe comparing it can lead to an optimal
end result.
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 02:16:57 EDT
After a quick glance at your spec, there are 2 things that my packaging does better:

- don't use a vendor prefix for the desktop file

- produce a meaningful debuginfo package
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 02:32:46 EDT
Matthias,

A vendor prefix was added based on an earlier review and a new draft was
proposed to clarify this though it hasn't been ratified yet. I can close this
review request if you want me to.  
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 07:48:06 EDT
Vendor prefixes just don't make sense.

Your bug number is lower, so you get to pick which review request you want to
close...
Comment 7 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 08:19:57 EDT
Closing off bug report. 
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 08:26:09 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281901 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.