Bug 281891 – Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam

Bug 281891 - Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam

Summary:	Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from yo...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 281901

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	248314 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-09-07 01:13 EDT by Rahul Sundaram
Modified:	2013-03-13 01:42 EDT (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-09-07 08:19:57 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 01:13:09 EDT

Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese-0.2.4-1.src.rpm
Description: 

cheese is a cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web 
cam. It also provides some graphical effects in order to please the 
users play instinct

Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 01:19:22 EDT

Note that a earlier view of this program was submitted for review and closed
after a time period of non-response at #248314. This spec file is based on that
but updated to meet the new licensing guidelines and earlier review. Thanks to
Parag for the pre-review comments.

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 02:07:35 EDT

*** Bug 248314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 02:14:56 EDT

Urgh, I did the very same thing today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901

My packaging was done independently; maybe comparing it can lead to an optimal
end result.

Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 02:16:57 EDT

After a quick glance at your spec, there are 2 things that my packaging does better:

- don't use a vendor prefix for the desktop file

- produce a meaningful debuginfo package

Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 02:32:46 EDT

Matthias,

A vendor prefix was added based on an earlier review and a new draft was
proposed to clarify this though it hasn't been ratified yet. I can close this
review request if you want me to.

Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 07:48:06 EDT

Vendor prefixes just don't make sense.

Your bug number is lower, so you get to pick which review request you want to
close...

Comment 7 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 08:19:57 EDT

Closing off bug report.

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 08:26:09 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281901 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.