Bug 281891 - Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam
Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from yo...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 281901
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 248314 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-09-07 05:13 UTC by Rahul Sundaram
Modified: 2013-03-13 05:42 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-07 12:19:57 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 05:13:09 UTC 
Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese-0.2.4-1.src.rpm
Description: 

cheese is a cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web 
cam. It also provides some graphical effects in order to please the 
users play instinct
Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 05:19:22 UTC 
Note that a earlier view of this program was submitted for review and closed
after a time period of non-response at #248314. This spec file is based on that
but updated to meet the new licensing guidelines and earlier review. Thanks to
Parag for the pre-review comments.
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 06:07:35 UTC 
*** Bug 248314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 06:14:56 UTC 
Urgh, I did the very same thing today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901

My packaging was done independently; maybe comparing it can lead to an optimal
end result.
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 06:16:57 UTC 
After a quick glance at your spec, there are 2 things that my packaging does better:

- don't use a vendor prefix for the desktop file

- produce a meaningful debuginfo package
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 06:32:46 UTC 
Matthias,

A vendor prefix was added based on an earlier review and a new draft was
proposed to clarify this though it hasn't been ratified yet. I can close this
review request if you want me to.
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2007-09-07 11:48:06 UTC 
Vendor prefixes just don't make sense.

Your bug number is lower, so you get to pick which review request you want to
close...
Comment 7 Rahul Sundaram 2007-09-07 12:19:57 UTC 
Closing off bug report.
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-07 12:26:09 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281901 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.